Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)

2. I would assume a similar statement about the judge's car would not be wise

Reply to Are_grits_groceries (Original post)

Fri Aug 16, 2013, 04:30 PM

Aug 2013

Even if............. .... ..... .... .

Never mind.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge sides with abortion opponent over alleged threat:"Bomb threat is free speech" [View all] Are_grits_groceries Aug 2013 OP

Uh, nowhere in this country except in that idiot's courtroom Warpy Aug 2013 #1

I would assume a similar statement about the judge's car would not be wise CBGLuthier Aug 2013 #2

i'd love to help you, ma'am Enrique Aug 2013 #3

A Clinton appointee, go figure.. n/t Fumesucker Aug 2013 #4

I was shocked when I saw that. niyad Aug 2013 #15

I'm not anymore Hydra Aug 2013 #22

Someone please post Dillard's info so we can spread it around the net with this story. PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #5

Well, here's her photo so let's start there. That look.. I've seen that before... CurtEastPoint Aug 2013 #7

What's the Matter with Kansas PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #9

YEAH VA_Jill Aug 2013 #19

And anybody can find her address here: lastlib Aug 2013 #25

That should have resulted in charges. Guess no one believes the inmate. That's conspiracy to commit. freshwest Aug 2013 #32

so that means dr. means can now send letters to ms. dillard that she okieinpain Aug 2013 #6

"Kansas" Fire Walk With Me Aug 2013 #8

This decision needs to be appealed. n/t kiranon Aug 2013 #10

Yes, judge just gave a green light to terrorism. freshwest Aug 2013 #31

This is a VERY dangerous precedent... Cooley Hurd Aug 2013 #11

What a hypocrite. Baitball Blogger Aug 2013 #12

That's insane. nt Robb Aug 2013 #13

It's clearly a threat of violence that if sent to a federal judge The Second Stone Aug 2013 #14

There was a case several years ago of a guy who posted a "threat" ET Awful Aug 2013 #16

because the threat is against an abortion provider, a WOMAN doctor, don't you know. niyad Aug 2013 #18

rec'ing for wider visibility. this judge, a CLINTON appointee, is clearly a reichwing stooge niyad Aug 2013 #17

OH YEAH???? cynzke Aug 2013 #20

Yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theater is not protected speech KamaAina Aug 2013 #21

But only if you don't mention a pressure cooker. Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2013 #23

Now, if I go to Wichita Jack Rabbit Aug 2013 #24

So the fine Federal Judge has no problem with an actual/stochastic terrorist threat which is just indepat Aug 2013 #26

Tom Martin practiced law in my hometown for many years. 1KansasDem Aug 2013 #27

This is a hideously dangerous Jamastiene Aug 2013 #28

It wasn't a threat. Even considering its disgustingness, the language is protected. Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #30

The judge actually made the correct decision. Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #29