Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
3. This is disturbing on so many levels
Sat Aug 17, 2013, 01:31 PM
Aug 2013
The technology exists for extreme abuse. All we have is *trust* that webcams in our homes, xboxes, smart TVs, aren't being used against us. This just adds more ugly to it.


... A BBC Radio 5 live investigation found sites where hackers exchanged pictures and videos of people captured on their own webcams without their knowledge.

A police spokeswoman said webcam hackers would be prosecuted.

Commons Home Affairs Committee chairman Keith Vaz urged teachers to talk to pupils about the dangers of using webcams, and computer manufacturers to improve security for users.
...
The BBC Radio 5 live team found a thriving black market where access to compromised computers was bought and sold for a few pence.
...
Hackers are able to gain access to victims' computers using a piece of malicious software (malware) called a remote-access Trojan (Rat).

Many Rats now include a function allowing a hacker to access the victim's webcam without their knowledge.
...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22967622


Webcam spying goes mainstream as Miss Teen USA describes hack
"The light didn't even go on, so I had no idea."

by Nate Anderson - Aug 16 2013, 4:40pm CAST




Wolf detailing her experience.
CNN/WPIX

Webcam hacking has officially gone mainstream with yesterday's revelation that the new Miss Teen USA, Cassidy Wolf, was the victim of a "sextortion" plot in which someone slipped Remote Administration Tool (RAT) software onto her computer and used it to snap (apparently nude) pictures of Wolf in her room. "I wasn’t aware that somebody was watching me (on my webcam)," she told The Today Show. "The light (on the camera) didn’t even go on, so I had no idea."

Wolf said that the hacker tried to extort her, threatening to release the pictures publicly if she didn't follow his demands. The FBI has admitted that it is investigating the case and eventually said that has identified a suspect.

The story itself isn't remarkable—indeed, earlier this year I documented an entire community of RAT users who gather to share tips and pictures of the "slaves" whose machines they have infected—but these kinds of sextortion plots have to date been covered largely in the tech press and in local papers. (Though GQ ran a fine story on sextortionist Luis Mijangos in early 2012 that's well worth a read). Wolf has now taken the story onto the morning TV talk shows, and her interviewers appear to be amazed that such hacks are even possible.

In doing interviews this week for my new book, The Internet Police, many of the questions have focused on sextortion and the use of RAT software. These hacks are such a profound privacy violation—accessing webcams, microphones, and stored files provides the attacker with almost unfettered access to one's private life, thoughts, documents, even conversations—that they routinely generate amazement in interlocutors. As one TV host put it after hearing Wolf's story this week, "Just—wow, that is creepy... Can you believe that?" Or, as a Jezebel writer put it today, "webcam hacking—WHICH I CANNOT BELIEVE IS A REAL THING OH MY GOD."

...

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/08/webcam-spying-goes-mainstream-as-miss-teen-usa-describes-hack/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yikes. The Hall Monitors have ... DirkGently Aug 2013 #1
This is disturbing on so many levels Catherina Aug 2013 #3
Indeed. Many many levels. n/t hootinholler Aug 2013 #4
I'm still amazed people have no idea how easy or prevalent this is laundry_queen Aug 2013 #14
THIS is a very serious problem, but it has nothing to do with the NSA pnwmom Aug 2013 #17
as far as we know questionseverything Aug 2013 #36
Post removed Post removed Aug 2013 #20
This sort of thing has been going on for a while. Here is a related story from 2010. xocet Aug 2013 #23
Dozens of the hall monitors have been implicated -- which is bad enough. pnwmom Aug 2013 #8
Rules are for the proles. nt bemildred Aug 2013 #2
Would you please change your title? There were dozens involved, not 5,000. pnwmom Aug 2013 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author JTFrog Aug 2013 #12
I'm going to leave it with the original title but you bring up a different good point. Catherina Aug 2013 #28
Your title is wrong because it falsely implies that all 5000 are FBI, CIA, NSA, pnwmom Aug 2013 #29
You should contact the ACLU directly. Maybe they'll be able to straighten it all out for you. n/t Catherina Aug 2013 #31
You shouldn't add to the chain of false information pnwmom Aug 2013 #32
Like I said, contact the ACLU. You seem confused about the various operations Catherina Aug 2013 #33
Nothing you cited says it was more than dozens. n/t pnwmom Aug 2013 #34
WTF?! bunnies Aug 2013 #6
Out of 5,000 people who had downloaded child porn, "dozens" turned out to be security people. pnwmom Aug 2013 #7
phew. ok. bunnies Aug 2013 #10
The ACLU person who sent the original twitter obviously didn't either. pnwmom Aug 2013 #11
Good heavens. Triana Aug 2013 #9
Can Your Data Be Safe When The Watchers Partake Of Child Pornography cantbeserious Aug 2013 #13
Certainly not if the data consists of child pornography. pnwmom Aug 2013 #15
USA! USA! USA! :sarcasm: in case it's needed - nt HardTimes99 Aug 2013 #16
Another problem is that porn sites East Coast Pirate Aug 2013 #18
Presumably the dozens of "watchers" (not 5,000) were watching from home computers, pnwmom Aug 2013 #19
The OP says it was done on work computers as well. East Coast Pirate Aug 2013 #21
You're right. Thank you for pointing that out. I was fixated on the words pnwmom Aug 2013 #22
Evil goes without saying. East Coast Pirate Aug 2013 #24
I used to be sysadmin on defense contractor networks. bemildred Aug 2013 #25
Besides the repulsive, evil creepiness of child pornography, tblue37 Aug 2013 #26
You cannot privatize national security malaise Aug 2013 #27
Exactly, but they have. And there's big money in the 'security' business. And I think that is the sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #30
Very well said malaise Aug 2013 #35
I support your view marions ghost Aug 2013 #41
Yeah following the 'disaster capitalism' model of governing Rex Aug 2013 #37
I know malaise Aug 2013 #38
Au contraire, mon ami. WinkyDink Aug 2013 #40
You may want to edit thread title for clarity TransitJohn Aug 2013 #39
"suspects also put the Defense Department "at risk of blackmail, bribery, and threats," Zorra Aug 2013 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ACLU: Who are the watcher...»Reply #3