Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Unknown Beatle

(2,691 posts)
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 04:15 AM Aug 2013

How convenient. Re: Miranda [View all]

Now they're stating that Miranda was carrying stolen, classified material. They have egg on their face, what do you expect them to say, "We were wrong"? They're just trying to justify their actions.

Question: If Miranda was carrying stolen, classified material, why did they let him go?

If Miranda really was carrying stolen, classified material and airport security found it, like they claim, they would have jailed him.

Let's say that they let Miranda go after nine hours and they didn't find out about the stolen material until after the fact. Wouldn't they file ex po facto criminal charges on Miranda since it was stolen and classified material?

Why would the government lie to us about Miranda? The government is trustworthy and would never lie to us.

In other words, I don't believe a damn thing about what both the British and American governments are telling us.

The corporate controlled government controls the press.

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How convenient. Re: Miranda [View all] Unknown Beatle Aug 2013 OP
Greenwald ADMITS Miranda was carrying docs from Snowden!!! uponit7771 Aug 2013 #1
If I'm proven wrong... Unknown Beatle Aug 2013 #5
I'm not a "gov = bad" person, I don't expect overt truth from ANY gov at ANY time in human history.. uponit7771 Aug 2013 #6
There doesn't seem to be any evidence that they were stolen or classified. reusrename Aug 2013 #7
Just says iamthebandfanman Aug 2013 #11
Nothing in there says that Greenwald said that. You have misread. Bonobo Aug 2013 #16
Sorry pal but astute readers will check your link ... GeorgeGist Aug 2013 #17
But Clapper told the least untruth he could come up with to Congress! Rex Aug 2013 #2
Also, the more I see "gov = bad" bullshit the more I suspect winger meme. I've never seen this uponit7771 Aug 2013 #3
Tell me? Unknown Beatle Aug 2013 #8
NO!! Who would trust them?! I never expected to either! That's what it means to have some secret uponit7771 Aug 2013 #9
I NEVER trusted the government. I was taught that at an early age by my mother and grandparents. hobbit709 Aug 2013 #13
Agreed! kaiden Aug 2013 #15
They don't usually file charges instantly. Time will tell. n/t pnwmom Aug 2013 #4
That was my question too. tblue Aug 2013 #10
"If Miranda was carrying stolen, classified material, why did they let him go? " iamthebandfanman Aug 2013 #12
"If Miranda was carrying stolen, classified material, why did they let him go? BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #14
Yup. n/t progressoid Aug 2013 #18
No-one official is claiming he had stolen material; only the authoritarian DUers claim that muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How convenient. Re: Miran...