Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

last1standing

(11,709 posts)
4. LOL! You praised one of my threads this morning then Damned this one.
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 06:27 AM
Aug 2013

I honestly like that you say what you think.

And it is a horrible hyperbolic analogy but I think it makes the point. What does alleged smuggling have to do with terrorism any more than smoking pot is tied with committing murder? If the British government wanted to detain Miranda or search him, why use a law supposedly designed to deter terrorism instead of existing laws that deter smuggling?

If Miranda actually did have classified documents on his person and the government had reason to believe such, then I'm not against them searching him. I'm against bending laws meant to stop atrocities to intimidate and bully individuals and that's what appears to have happened at first blush.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Detaining Miranda under t...»Reply #4