Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: White House: US Was Given 'Heads Up' Before David Miranda Detained - GuardianUK [View all]geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)14. "we don't need any confirmation."
Yes, for you and yours assumptions and beliefs trump silly little things like facts and evidence.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
White House: US Was Given 'Heads Up' Before David Miranda Detained - GuardianUK [View all]
WillyT
Aug 2013
OP
The UK government has been a puppet of the US since Blair lied his country into war for Bush.
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#12
Lol, well once again, we have been proven right, because now we HAVE confirmation, do we not?
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#18
I didn't say he was. Thankfully his own government has registered their opinion on what was done
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#24
Lol, the UK is a willing Proxy Government. They miss their old Impire and are more than willing to
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#41
Yes, the UK Puppet Government lied and lied for Bush. I remember it well. And no matter how
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#39
"We had an indication it was likely to occur but it's not something we requested"
Cali_Democrat
Aug 2013
#3
They should have told them not to do that. It is a violation beyond belief and an abuse of
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#13
Then he must have been a suspected terrorist? Because that is the only way it would have been
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#38
There's nothing in the law requiring the person be a terrorist in the normal sense of the word
Recursion
Aug 2013
#52