Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How do you know they were stolen documents? [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)33. Right, and you're assuming that it has no relation to the statement that follows.
Mr. Miranda was in Berlin to deliver documents related to Mr. Greenwalds investigation into government surveillance to Ms. Poitras, Mr. Greenwald said.
Ms. Poitras, in turn, gave Mr. Miranda different documents to pass to Mr. Greenwald.
Those documents, which were stored on encrypted thumb drives, were confiscated by airport security, Mr. Greenwald said.
All of the documents came from the trove of materials provided to the two journalists by Mr. Snowden.
The British authorities seized all of his electronic media including video games, DVDs and data storage devices and did not return them, Mr. Greenwald said.
Ms. Poitras, in turn, gave Mr. Miranda different documents to pass to Mr. Greenwald.
Those documents, which were stored on encrypted thumb drives, were confiscated by airport security, Mr. Greenwald said.
All of the documents came from the trove of materials provided to the two journalists by Mr. Snowden.
The British authorities seized all of his electronic media including video games, DVDs and data storage devices and did not return them, Mr. Greenwald said.
Which is why I asked: Did she gave him encrypted recipes or something unrelated ("Those documents...were confiscated"
Despite the context of the text, you are assuming that he was returning with encrypted document completely unrelated to Snowden's leak.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Right, and you're assuming that it has no relation to the statement that follows.
ProSense
Aug 2013
#33
If what you write is true, does that mean the NSA and GCHQ are still trying to figure
Vinnie From Indy
Aug 2013
#10
Apparently, the Brits stole them from Miranda so they could find out what the NSA is doing.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Aug 2013
#14
So a person allegedly in possession of stolen documents was released without charges.
Warren Stupidity
Aug 2013
#15
No official is calling them stolen documents, because they weren't
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2013
#19
Woah, does that mean we can be detained for possessing leaked information?
napoleon_in_rags
Aug 2013
#26