Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
14. The purpose of the NSA program and the harassment of Laura Poitras is to prevent the exercise of
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 06:27 PM
Aug 2013

free speech and the existence of a free press.

I have tried to explain that the NSA program (and this part of the Homeland Security's programs) chills speech.

Laura Poitras' detention at airports is a vivid and clear example of how security laws are being used to chill speech. Remember. This could happen to you. It could happen to anyone who likes to discuss or write about politics. This could happen to anyone in a union or anyone who tries to form a union. This could happen to anyone who writes their member of Congress or the President and criticizes some pet law or legislation of the person receiving the letter or e-mail

This is the precise conduct that our Bill of Rights prohibits.

And, sorry, guys, it started long ago. But it is getting worse.

This has to stop.

If you don't believe my claims about how this has been a long time coming, please watch this video that was posted by SnappyTurtle some days ago on DU:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017139372

Everyone needs to watch that video. It is long but excellent. It explains how the NSA was involved in the installation of the Shaw in Iran (which set off our current problems with Iran), the Iran-Contra scandal and a lot of other undemocratic conduct that has harmed our foreign policy and endangered our constitutional government.

A lot of people are getting fed up with this. On top of the mismanagement of the economy during the Clinton and Bush years, the increasing repression is unacceptable.

The apologists for the NSA are a sorry bunch. I doubt that they know what they are defending.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

du rec. xchrom Aug 2013 #1
Jacob Appelbaum gets the same treatment Catherina Aug 2013 #2
Now he is one INTERESTING dude! snooper2 Aug 2013 #5
Freedumb ain't free!!1! progressoid Aug 2013 #3
Fascinating. That woman is amazing. Autumn Aug 2013 #4
Thankfully the New York Times ran her story Babel_17 Aug 2013 #6
Yes it is. I had no idea. I've heard her name in this story but had Autumn Aug 2013 #7
I found a youtube video where she speaks of the treatment she received Babel_17 Aug 2013 #8
I can't come up with words to describe how I feel about this. Autumn Aug 2013 #9
This interview should be required viewing... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #10
I think I'll be posting it elsewhere, as appropriate. Babel_17 Aug 2013 #12
Thank you for posting that. Awful n/t Catherina Aug 2013 #18
Brave woman. kentuck Aug 2013 #23
New York Times article says that she's communicating with Greenwald Babel_17 Aug 2013 #11
The window is quickly closing. n/t Egalitarian Thug Aug 2013 #13
The purpose of the NSA program and the harassment of Laura Poitras is to prevent the exercise of JDPriestly Aug 2013 #14
I just started watching Babel_17 Aug 2013 #17
a very important background story Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #15
But that was back in the old Bush days, right? Remember how they used to put people like sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #16
Kudos to those journalists who realize what's at stake Babel_17 Aug 2013 #48
Absolutely. They are definitely very courageous people. sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #51
Pretty standard for authoritarian regimes. blackspade Aug 2013 #19
It IS athoritarian. East Coast Pirate Aug 2013 #21
That's what I said! blackspade Aug 2013 #25
The War on Terror is over. Terrorists already won. Let's stop pretending. 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #20
Our party, our nation, will need spokespeople with the courage of their convictions Babel_17 Aug 2013 #22
I think many Republicans can be brought along actually 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #33
I hope you're right Babel_17 Aug 2013 #47
I would say the corporate authoritarians won. nt woo me with science Aug 2013 #26
Well, there is that unpleasant fact as well 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #29
Yes, the War on Terror is over. Now it is War on the People. avaistheone1 Aug 2013 #37
Yep. Terry Gilliam had it about right 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #41
Damn this is getting ridiculously real. avaistheone1 Aug 2013 #44
And our usual band of suspects is silent on this. GoneOffShore Aug 2013 #24
Is Greenwlad Cryptoad Aug 2013 #27
No, so far just you Autumn Aug 2013 #31
Paul would be Proud,,,,,,,,, Cryptoad Aug 2013 #35
So would OFA Autumn Aug 2013 #36
Which stance is that,,, Cryptoad Aug 2013 #38
So far OFA has been consistant, they helped us elect Obama. You will have to read to Autumn Aug 2013 #39
Its not OFA that I talking about changing its positon Cryptoad Aug 2013 #43
I don't understand your question (nt) Babel_17 Aug 2013 #46
This is the behavior of a totalitarian state. woo me with science Aug 2013 #28
I had no idea it was this bad. neverforget Aug 2013 #30
The Bush-Cheney administration couldn't have done it better. MotherPetrie Aug 2013 #32
Well, they started it though it's continuance is on our current security apparatus Babel_17 Aug 2013 #49
K&R chervilant Aug 2013 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author KittyWampus Aug 2013 #40
Amazing info Oilwellian Aug 2013 #42
Imagine when things like this are more common AZ Progressive Aug 2013 #45
"heightened circumstances" Babel_17 Aug 2013 #50
K&R idwiyo Aug 2013 #52
I don't understand why she didn't just mail the drives to the UK. dipsydoodle Aug 2013 #53
I think it was intended for Greenwald who lives in Brazil Babel_17 Aug 2013 #54
I hadn't picked up it was just a stopover. dipsydoodle Aug 2013 #55
Rachel Maddow did a segment about Poitras last night. It was informative...... Little Star Aug 2013 #56
Huh, thanks for that! The bigger picture is coming into focus Babel_17 Aug 2013 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Regarding the person Laur...»Reply #14