Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

polynomial

(750 posts)
2. Sometimes what we see is shocking
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 07:13 AM
Aug 2013

What you see is what you get, some people are made out of wood and some people are made out of plastic. That’s part of the words to a song long ago popular in the early seventies. However what you see could turn into some kind of shock in that many just stare like a deer frozen in the light beam. Why should it be so unusual to just stare to take in all of what is happening sifting through to try honestly to discern “What’s Goin On”.

Recently Snowden and Manning releasing secrets Americans are not supposed to know have a new metal effect that drives thinking. Now our government has had the capability to develop my personal behavior with Metadata that includes impulse reasoning with a mathematical crisp field of certainty. Begging another question will an observed American carry out that proposed impulse. It is for certain a new consciousness is born. With this a new feeling scary that resonates in many minds echoing the right to life needing that free will to think through good versus evil. Exactly not whether many are politically right or left but just what is good or bad.

Also, whether to abort this sense of secret spying is placed before you as the decider. The new born common ground “secret spying” begs the question to stop it or continue it. To abort or not to. Here, A Journalist Rachael Maddow openly defines this as not doing anything is as peculiar as don’t ask, don’t tell mental Clinton era reasoning especially designed for Gay’s. America went through a whole decade or more of don’t ask, don’t tell metal convolution, that from my view point is weird. Especially in the military and likely in secret intelligence parts of our system that operated with total preference that favored gay’s.

As many dig deeper Rachael Maddow having a wonderful personality happy go lucky especially warm and seemingly honest with good intentions offers up a totally stressful dark side in a hidden veil of analysis

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Where ever we are..... daleanime Aug 2013 #1
Sometimes what we see is shocking polynomial Aug 2013 #2
Perhaps mimi85 Aug 2013 #3
Let him fly into this country Cryptoad Aug 2013 #18
Kick and rec - it was a tremendous segment. Cooley Hurd Aug 2013 #4
Saw it last night & agree it was a tremendous segment! Little Star Aug 2013 #6
Notice the Administration refuses to say whether the seized information morningfog Aug 2013 #5
Only Murdock newpapers are legit with legit journalist. which is why bonniebgood Aug 2013 #7
But we no longer have Fox having a monopoly of middle eastern owned media here... cascadiance Aug 2013 #8
Hear! Hear! another_liberal Aug 2013 #14
Bullshit treestar Aug 2013 #9
You need a laugh track here Bragi Aug 2013 #11
The Truth Cryptoad Aug 2013 #19
Journalism is now equal to "terrorism"? What next criticism of the corporate-military state?? Civilization2 Aug 2013 #20
I think she is right. n/t secondwind Aug 2013 #10
Tell them like it is! another_liberal Aug 2013 #12
Note the absence of the usual suspects Bragi Aug 2013 #13
Look upthread. It just now turned 8am on the east coast. Cerridwen Aug 2013 #15
Sorry Rachel, that is old America think, we are now in new amurka. MyNameGoesHere Aug 2013 #16
Oh me!!! Cryptoad Aug 2013 #17
Since when has Greenwald been charged with theft? n/t markpkessinger Aug 2013 #22
Never said he was,,,, Cryptoad Aug 2013 #39
You said, he was "the 'partner' of a known thief" markpkessinger Aug 2013 #42
That be Greewald,,,,,, Cryptoad Aug 2013 #55
Greenwald has received stolen documents from a whistleblower . . . markpkessinger Aug 2013 #60
Sorry,,,,, Cryptoad Aug 2013 #61
Right -- SNOWDEN, not GREENWALD n/t markpkessinger Aug 2013 #62
You are a thief Cryptoad Aug 2013 #63
You might be guilty of receiving stolen goods . . . markpkessinger Aug 2013 #64
not much differences Cryptoad Aug 2013 #69
The "partner". Pretty transparent. The Link Aug 2013 #25
Of what? nt Cryptoad Aug 2013 #43
You are clearly a "liberal" and a "progressive" The Link Aug 2013 #65
Are you down to Cryptoad Aug 2013 #67
Just quoting...geez. The Link Aug 2013 #68
Quoting what? Cryptoad Aug 2013 #71
what the fuck is a "know thief",,,,,,,,????? DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2013 #26
That is called a typo Cryptoad Aug 2013 #46
What's with the square quotes around the word partner? markpkessinger Aug 2013 #29
Its a quote,,,,,, geez Cryptoad Aug 2013 #50
What's with the quotes around partner? NuclearDem Aug 2013 #31
just quoting,,,,,,geez nt Cryptoad Aug 2013 #53
Sadly, I've gotten bashed mercilessly in the past for making the exact same point Blue_Tires Aug 2013 #21
knr Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #23
Telling our closest allies what they can and can't do is called dictatorship. JaneyVee Aug 2013 #24
Lame. /nt Marr Aug 2013 #28
Right, except when everyone uses it to defend other countries, such as JaneyVee Aug 2013 #30
Lame. Marr Aug 2013 #33
But you agree that we are not the UK, right? JaneyVee Aug 2013 #36
You're asking me if I agree that the United States is not the United Kingdom? Marr Aug 2013 #38
Ok, two points NuclearDem Aug 2013 #40
Well said! n/t markpkessinger Aug 2013 #47
Good points. But the UK gave us a heads up as they were about to detain him. JaneyVee Aug 2013 #48
When did we conquer the UK? jeff47 Aug 2013 #27
I thought the US has no right to bully othercountries and tell them what to do? Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #32
Nobody has suggested the U.S. should have "bullied" the U.K. . . . markpkessinger Aug 2013 #37
So in this instance, it would have been OK to tell a sovereign country what to do.... Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #41
Are you saying the U.S. government can never voice an objection . . . markpkessinger Aug 2013 #45
Of course the US can voice an objection Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #56
I think people have a problem with the U.S. telling other countries what to do under threat of force markpkessinger Aug 2013 #70
that's when they think they're doing it. When they don't do it.. it's called Cha Aug 2013 #54
Bingo. n/t Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #57
+1! nt sheshe2 Aug 2013 #66
I expect more nuanced reporting from Rachel n/t War Horse Aug 2013 #34
She is right. The government's actions are proving the claims being made about them. liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #35
So should we invade the UK? Rachel, your my girl...but not on this. nt kelliekat44 Aug 2013 #44
that's quite a leap. Those are really the only two options? Either never criticize other liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #49
No invasion required nor suggested in Rachel's segment . . . markpkessinger Aug 2013 #52
Under the bus with you!!!!! Rex Aug 2013 #51
Oh, and move over kids: we gotta make room for Rachel under this bus! DJ13 Aug 2013 #58
I see nothing wrong with letting Airstrip One handle this markiv Aug 2013 #59
K&R idwiyo Aug 2013 #72
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rachel: "Letting our clo...»Reply #2