Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
43. Can you explain what you think that means?
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 08:43 AM
Aug 2013

Did I claim it was a moral judgement? No, I am clearly saying the author of this piece speaks like a self indulgent spoiled brat. Self serving and shallow, not moral or immoral, just amoral empty space. As the Sex Pistols said 'pretty vacant'.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm pretty much of a mind that (to put it simply) LeftofObama Aug 2013 #1
So what about leftist authoritarianism, or rightist libertarianism? Recursion Aug 2013 #4
The origin of the term "left" is the French Revolution RainDog Aug 2013 #2
Right, we both are on the left so we think "reward the winners" is a bullshit sentiment Recursion Aug 2013 #3
He may point out a pov, but that pov is not supported by data RainDog Aug 2013 #6
Well, Millman isn't particularly interested in left or right as he calls them out here Recursion Aug 2013 #10
not really RainDog Aug 2013 #12
Which of his economic positions are you thinking of? Recursion Aug 2013 #15
Winners and losers RainDog Aug 2013 #18
He's talking about the character in "War & Peace" Recursion Aug 2013 #19
Women, apparently, are losers according to this metric RainDog Aug 2013 #22
Yes, that would be exactly his argument Recursion Aug 2013 #26
Victims are not losers RainDog Aug 2013 #29
Call it "victims" and "predators" then if you prefer Recursion Aug 2013 #38
the left sides with the general welfare RainDog Aug 2013 #50
I'm a disabled female... Jasana Aug 2013 #62
Our neolithic ancestors were more advanced than rightwingers RainDog Aug 2013 #65
Napoleon, in War and Peace, is Napoleon the historical figure RainDog Aug 2013 #27
If Napoleon had conquered Russia RainDog Aug 2013 #33
The bulk of his career has been on the Street as a trader in derivites. He cashed out 3 years ago Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #32
He's an incrementalist, his interest in in the status quo which serves him, his 'thinking' is faith Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #25
This is correct nil desperandum Aug 2013 #34
Deficits were created by cutting taxes on the wealthy RainDog Aug 2013 #36
Actually, it was not the Estates General Fortinbras Armstrong Aug 2013 #47
thanks for the correction RainDog Aug 2013 #51
I call bullshit on that article. cali Aug 2013 #5
It's not an article, it's a review of Tolstoy Recursion Aug 2013 #8
the author says it's his own definition RainDog Aug 2013 #11
So if you don't like the "winners/losers" dichotomy, what do you like? Recursion Aug 2013 #20
immature vs. mature RainDog Aug 2013 #23
I don't see how "winners" vs. "losers" is different from "1%" vs. "99%" Recursion Aug 2013 #28
99% is Democracy. 1% is oligarchy RainDog Aug 2013 #31
I think we're on the side of the downtrodden. The "losers" Recursion Aug 2013 #39
No. I'm on the side of justice, humanity and the general welfare RainDog Aug 2013 #45
+1 deutsey Aug 2013 #58
If you were to look at it in European political terms Fortinbras Armstrong Aug 2013 #49
exactly n/t RainDog Aug 2013 #53
To me, being liberal is mostly about treating people equally. LuvNewcastle Aug 2013 #7
Personally, I think political labels are claptrap. Skidmore Aug 2013 #9
yeah but that's false burnodo Aug 2013 #13
But we're pretty clearly left "relative to" the Republicans Recursion Aug 2013 #14
Does Noah Williams write for pay, or is this amateur time? Quantess Aug 2013 #16
Did you read the whole piece? It's an interesting take on Tolstoy Recursion Aug 2013 #17
No, I didn't. Quantess Aug 2013 #24
The author is a lifelong Wall Street trader who cashed out in 2010 to 'write' for American Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #35
The guy is pretty stupid, if you ask me. n/t RainDog Aug 2013 #37
I think you nailed it well with 'vapid'. I'd also add self serving to his own status and story. Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #42
Aha, so he got his job through connections. Or nepotism. Quantess Aug 2013 #44
he's providing a hand job for narcissists n/t RainDog Aug 2013 #46
Note the similarities to Charlie 'I'm Winning' Sheen, unearned gigs, nepotism and cash... Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #48
In the most literal sense loyalsister Aug 2013 #21
"Not all conservatives are stupid people, but stupid people are groovedaddy Aug 2013 #30
Charlie Sheen and other spoiled brats have previously claimed that money = winning = everything. Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #40
Very good example Recursion Aug 2013 #41
Can you explain what you think that means? Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #43
so, you're basically buying in to this frame? RainDog Aug 2013 #54
What on earth are you talking about? Recursion Aug 2013 #57
I think your pov is determined by rightwing ideology RainDog Aug 2013 #61
Jesus Christ *of course* we're losing Recursion Aug 2013 #63
you don't understand what I have said, apparently RainDog Aug 2013 #64
As I posted a few years ago, my basic distinction is: LeftishBrit Aug 2013 #52
Port and Starboard. MineralMan Aug 2013 #55
Contrived political cant. bemildred Aug 2013 #56
I orbit Salon.com in a black helicopter. KG Aug 2013 #59
I missed the fight on this, apparently RainDog Aug 2013 #66
fake labels to enable a 2 fake party stranglehold nt markiv Aug 2013 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What do "left" and "right...»Reply #43