Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
14. That's why I wrote this thread with the tone of the title. Granted - maybe - the whole reason
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 09:56 AM
Aug 2013

yours truly was in this saga; was simply to help prevent Romney from becoming POTUS.


The "King of Bain" was funded by Sheldon Adelson and the Producer of the film was a former Romney Aid. In the same way that Matt Taibbi was ordered by Rolling Stone editors to skip the eToys case in his September 2012 cover story "Greed and Debt" - they King of Bain film simply skipped over eToys also.

They tested the waters with King of Bain to see if they could control the news with Clear Channel and other efforts, to keep Romney's Achilles heel out of the news. Mitt even lied on his federal campaign finance form about when he was CEO at Bain, to make sure he was not tied to the 2001 period of time. When he got "caught" on that issue, he simply claimed he was "retroactively" retired from August 2001; back to February 11, 1999. Know what else happened in August 2001? Did you pay attention to the notes in the thread above?

Romney/ Goldman Sachs law firm is MNAT and their partner, Colm Connolly - because U.S. Attorney August 2, 2001!
http://www.justice.gov/archive/olp/colmconnollyresume.htm


All the proof of more than 100 felonies (Racketeering) can all be found in the public docket record. That is what is so punishing about all of this. We also have confessions to Perjury & intentional fraud on the court; but everyone in the Department of Justice either gets promoted off, resigns or joins the Gangs!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Goldman Sachs Is Above th...»Reply #14