Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
283. My Gawd, the stupidity on this is mind boggling!
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 01:09 PM
Aug 2013

It is not stolen property.

First of all, it is leaked information from the US government's spying agency. The last time I checked, the UK was not involved in oversight of the NSA.

Second of all, it is leaked information just like the Pentagon Papers and numerous other instances of whistle-blowing and investigative journalism.

Finally, it is not the their property, it is ours! Can y'all not fucking get that. The government is beholden to us, the people of the United States. They are keeping programs secret in the name of 'The War on Terror' that are not protecting us but are instead attempting to control us.

This 'property' is mine. It is yours. It is all of ours. I bloody well want it disseminated to all corners of the damned globe in order to stop this little authoritarian surveillance state dead in its tracks. That is why Freedom of the Press is a foundational freedom of this democratic Republic we call the US of A. Without it, bullshit claims about this 'data' being 'their stolen property' is allowed to pass the smell test....which bluntly, it just doesn't!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

is there any more room under the bus...? mike_c Aug 2013 #1
We've got a whole fleet of buses now. LWolf Aug 2013 #273
If this were done under a Republican President........ neverforget Aug 2013 #2
They don't have Republicans in the U.K. pnwmom Aug 2013 #103
So they don't have conservatives there? neverforget Aug 2013 #108
They do. But they don't work under Obama. n/t pnwmom Aug 2013 #113
UK Conservatives are not even Republican-Lite. dipsydoodle Aug 2013 #222
Yes, they have their reasons... awoke_in_2003 Aug 2013 #155
Torys. tblue Aug 2013 #158
I know they have their own conservatives. But this wasn't "done under" pnwmom Aug 2013 #252
Not publicly anyway. former9thward Aug 2013 #267
They all march Why Syzygy Aug 2013 #317
The UK was so concerned about the leaked US documents, that they invoked a TERROR LAW! Civilization2 Aug 2013 #240
I didn't say it had nothing to do with us. But they have just as much reason as our govt. pnwmom Aug 2013 #251
Its totally different when its under a Republican President LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #107
heh. JackRiddler Aug 2013 #138
Lol! NealK Aug 2013 #204
Score! n/t backscatter712 Aug 2013 #216
Extra nice post! Enthusiast Aug 2013 #221
Brilliant! truebrit71 Aug 2013 #236
That's different! Capt. Obvious Aug 2013 #241
I never thought I would ask for a link to a ProSense post hootinholler Aug 2013 #249
I have to give credit where credit is due LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #253
I think this is it... progressoid Aug 2013 #275
Thanks! hootinholler Aug 2013 #277
"I have many documents about England's espionage system" - G. Greenwald struggle4progress Aug 2013 #256
Nice one! Of course, that was then... AllyCat Aug 2013 #331
This bullshit was started by republicans and the RepubliDems are expanding it. n/t L0oniX Aug 2013 #114
Valerie Plame hfojvt Aug 2013 #153
Let's see. Cheney leaked info that outed an agent for political purposes. neverforget Aug 2013 #157
a bit of a warfle to compare this to Vietnam, isn't it? hfojvt Aug 2013 #179
drone murders count? gitmo/abu ghraib? occupations? The war-OF-terror is an awful mess,. Civilization2 Aug 2013 #242
most of those millions were killed in Iraq hfojvt Aug 2013 #310
Iraq was in the War-OF-Terror. They declared war on a tactic remember? Not one country all of THEM Civilization2 Aug 2013 #323
all in favor of free passes for significant others trafficking in stolen stuff, raise your hand uhnope Aug 2013 #3
OK, so you're hands are definitely UP for the OP. nt NorthCarolina Aug 2013 #6
So you are in favor of the detainment of journalists and their significant others. Marrah_G Aug 2013 #7
Or torture, or indefinite detention Demeter Aug 2013 #212
Journalists should simply accept anything christx30 Aug 2013 #314
What stolen stuff did he have? leftstreet Aug 2013 #10
He had documents that Snowden stole on his thumb drive, according to Greenwald uhnope Aug 2013 #34
How do we know they weren't LOLCATs? leftstreet Aug 2013 #36
LOL! I hope they were! deurbano Aug 2013 #88
Empires are known for that... Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2013 #167
I have it on the strictest confidence that Enthusiast Aug 2013 #223
Mr Greenwald never said that they were Snowden documents. If you read your paragraph Luminous Animal Aug 2013 #85
That makes it 'truth'…. railsback Aug 2013 #102
I agree with what you seem to be implying: delrem Aug 2013 #172
So which Greenwald lie do you believe? GeorgeGist Aug 2013 #215
That was source material provided to the Journalist, Greenwald, which means it was perfectly sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #99
leaked material may be how SOME journalists get stuff hfojvt Aug 2013 #311
Let's cut to the chase. delrem Aug 2013 #168
You will notice Mr Greenwald did not say the docs were from Snowden. Mojorabbit Aug 2013 #200
Summary execution then! Journalists are the new terrorists!! Off with their heads!!! No trials!!!! Civilization2 Aug 2013 #245
Uhm, that's not theft, its probably a violation of some state secret acts, but not theft... Humanist_Activist Aug 2013 #297
same difference. Point is, getting detained for having that in yr possession is not surprising. nt uhnope Aug 2013 #298
Its not a "same difference", generally theft carries a lot less of a penalty... Humanist_Activist Aug 2013 #299
...warfle warfle... WilliamPitt Aug 2013 #11
The warflers seem to believe that those who make the laws are above the law. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #257
WTF is this shit? mindwalker_i Aug 2013 #16
You nailed it, right here... City Lights Aug 2013 #24
it's not that the president is a Dem Skittles Aug 2013 #131
nope. delrem Aug 2013 #174
I think you are misunderstanding Skittles Aug 2013 #187
Please explain what you mean, Skittles. This is a civil rights issue. It has nothing to do with chimpymustgo Aug 2013 #220
the Dems who are excusing these violations Skittles Aug 2013 #319
Oh, for sure! Thanks for clarifying! chimpymustgo Aug 2013 #320
whassup, chimpy? Skittles Aug 2013 #321
I hadn't thought of it that way. City Lights Aug 2013 #238
That's one hand up so far. sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #26
There's also document "laundering" Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #62
Lol, I think we need a list. And from a random poster too. Someone should maybe hire sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #83
you all pick the best names bobduca Aug 2013 #30
How'd they know? Cerridwen Aug 2013 #40
reminds me of the longtime roommate of any trafficker getting detained. uhnope Aug 2013 #67
I imagine it does. Cerridwen Aug 2013 #208
Do you think Greenwald and/or Miranda are terrorists? morningfog Aug 2013 #43
do you think sneaking stolen stuff thru an airport should be okay? How about kiddie porn? uhnope Aug 2013 #54
Do you think they are terrorists? morningfog Aug 2013 #58
oh I get it. you're with us or you're with the terrorists, double reversed. uhnope Aug 2013 #65
Do you think they are terrorists? Should be an easy morningfog Aug 2013 #66
Have you stopped beating your boyfriend? Should be easy. Take a logic class uhnope Aug 2013 #74
Do you think they are terrorists? morningfog Aug 2013 #76
You failed logic. Jakes Progress Aug 2013 #244
Just answer the damned question. Do you think Miranda is a terrorist? eom ChisolmTrailDem Aug 2013 #264
Did you misplace your reply? Jakes Progress Aug 2013 #344
That's not at all what that is. It is a simple question. cui bono Aug 2013 #193
Not what was asked. Jakes Progress Aug 2013 #243
first you're sneaking stolen sturf thru the airport, before you know it, yer Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #206
Where is the proof of child pornagraphry? tnlefty Aug 2013 #87
Now you are trying to equate whistleblowing to kiddie porn? LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #110
And notice the repeated refusal to say it is not terrorism. morningfog Aug 2013 #120
And these people claim to be Democrats LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #126
They detained him under a terrorist statute tazkcmo Aug 2013 #165
Please tell me you are not really equating Snowden's leaks with kiddie porn. cui bono Aug 2013 #192
"Hell, It could have been HUMAN HEADS, for god's sake, a thumb drive full of HUMAN FREAKIN HEADS!" Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #205
when they come for your rights questionseverything Aug 2013 #246
is this the new meme? if you support the leaks, then you support kiddie porn? frylock Aug 2013 #272
Remember - Supreme Court - Pentagon papers - it is UK though so all different rules Valhallakey Aug 2013 #330
This message was self-deleted by its author frylock Aug 2013 #64
There are legal avenues to deal with such violations. morningfog Aug 2013 #82
You're missing that it's legal to persecute someone for revealing illegal spying. n/t Fire Walk With Me Aug 2013 #98
Put down the crack pipe. L0oniX Aug 2013 #117
Prove that tazkcmo Aug 2013 #159
prove it all night long uhnope Aug 2013 #178
Let's parse this quote once and for all for the reading & comprehension impaired. TM99 Aug 2013 #214
+1 nt Javaman Aug 2013 #269
Awesome! hueymahl Aug 2013 #274
That's ridiculous, dumb and illiterate. But I'll make you a bet uhnope Aug 2013 #278
I don't gamble with idiots. TM99 Aug 2013 #280
you're a very confused person but you're smart not to take a losing bet. uhnope Aug 2013 #291
Confused? TM99 Aug 2013 #316
Even if what you say is entirely true, that makes him a terrorist... how? cui bono Aug 2013 #191
+1 uponit7771 Aug 2013 #194
'Trafficking' means smuggling illegal items or people with intent so sell them Celefin Aug 2013 #207
Uhhhh, NOPE! hootinholler Aug 2013 #255
blindfolds and ear plugs are all the rage! nt Javaman Aug 2013 #268
There is a place on my ignore list for anyone who thinks it is okay Marrah_G Aug 2013 #4
There are a lot of people posting here lately go west young man Aug 2013 #97
I'd say there are also laundry_queen Aug 2013 #182
Either sleepers, bvar22 Aug 2013 #294
they'll stop defending this stuff in the beginning of 2017 Skittles Aug 2013 #101
Bingo! Marrah_G Aug 2013 #105
They'll just switch to the next President. RC Aug 2013 #115
no, they will not Skittles Aug 2013 #125
Oh, I'll be watching. RC Aug 2013 #127
I'll be keeping them on Ignore Skittles Aug 2013 #130
You got that right. RC Aug 2013 #150
Scary times. It shows there is no limit to what they will defend. morningfog Aug 2013 #121
Don't do it, please. It's easy to ignore them the old fashioned way, but not seeing the shit Egalitarian Thug Aug 2013 #148
I know they are here, I just choose not to read their crap Marrah_G Aug 2013 #151
Ms. Thug is a redhead, I have some notion. Egalitarian Thug Aug 2013 #162
I have hope that eventually the admins will get tired of it :) Marrah_G Aug 2013 #166
I doubt that, Marrah Demeter Aug 2013 #213
Mine too. backscatter712 Aug 2013 #217
Hee hee...K&R. Fire Walk With Me Aug 2013 #5
A sure sign of authoritarianism is if you are defending this action quinnox Aug 2013 #8
They're not that hard to find... kenny blankenship Aug 2013 #9
No, they sure aren't hard to find, kenny... MrMickeysMom Aug 2013 #13
Here's some more hands up in Greece kenny blankenship Aug 2013 #14
Oh good... one_voice Aug 2013 #22
That would be just won't do HangOnKids Aug 2013 #156
This message was self-deleted by its author one_voice Aug 2013 #232
I'm waiting for Attilla the Hun... Whisp Aug 2013 #202
Wait, so just because someone is a journalist, woolldog Aug 2013 #12
Just because someone's the president, mindwalker_i Aug 2013 #17
Explain how a Journalist is breaking the law by publishing material s/he received from a source? sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #27
So-called journalist Victor Lazslo was not merely accused but found guilty kenny blankenship Aug 2013 #46
Is this a reference to the film 'Casablanca'? - nt HardTimes99 Aug 2013 #133
yes. kenny blankenship Aug 2013 #175
He was detained under Title 7 of their version of the Patriot Act. tazkcmo Aug 2013 #173
Miranda was detained using a law explicitly passed to allow interviews of suspected terrorists. Maedhros Aug 2013 #284
They are just mystified why they are being called authoritarians. Nt. Warren Stupidity Aug 2013 #15
They don't even understand what the word means. dawg Aug 2013 #19
they also think that the word "liberal" means "not republican" frylock Aug 2013 #71
Don't forget about their dogs. rug Aug 2013 #18
Depends if they broke the law michigandem58 Aug 2013 #20
Explain how a journalist is breaking any law by using material provided to him/her by a Source. sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #28
His cellphone, laptops and memory sticks were confiscated. michigandem58 Aug 2013 #31
Really? Why were they confiscated. Was he on a terrorist list? Did he commit a crime? Before sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #33
he had stolen documents. he isn't a member of the press. he's the boyfriend. uhnope Aug 2013 #38
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR tazkcmo Aug 2013 #176
+1 NealK Aug 2013 #210
Under the Terrorism Act of 2000, he doesn't have to be even be suspected of terrorism michigandem58 Aug 2013 #41
I'm not interested in those phony Bush/Cheney inspired fake laws. I am asking how a person sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #53
He was detained with good reason michigandem58 Aug 2013 #77
'Mr. Greenwald' is a Journalist. 'Deeply enmeshed' with a Journalist writing a news story, is sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #95
Ahaha A spoksman on the issue! Egnever Aug 2013 #136
What is your point? There was no crime, the UK has acknowledged they did what they did sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #184
If you defend a government's actions Maedhros Aug 2013 #290
Bush and Cheney influenced a law passed in another country before they were selected? n/t sweetloukillbot Aug 2013 #104
Do you think Miranda might have been engaging in terrorism? morningfog Aug 2013 #69
And you're OK with that? East Coast Pirate Aug 2013 #79
Miranda is not a journalist. KittyWampus Aug 2013 #116
Is he a terrorist, in your opinion? morningfog Aug 2013 #122
He was doing nothing illegal. His partner is a journalist and he was assisting him. So again sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #171
Whether he is a journalist or not is irrelevant. Maedhros Aug 2013 #292
He is a potential threat to the authoritarian state and should be punished accordingly. rhett o rick Aug 2013 #301
I have seen not one shred of evidence of terrorism. morningfog Aug 2013 #44
We have a few here sadly. Journalism = Terrorism. It has since Bush began this 'war on terror'. sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #21
Flame bait post. longship Aug 2013 #23
well Will, as you can see there are a handful here who do believe in detaining journalist and don't Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #25
They are unfamiliar with the laws on Journalism and assume that when a journalist uses material sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #32
Laws of Journalism? sweetloukillbot Aug 2013 #109
You never read the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution? You are unaware of sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #163
Oh, I'm aware of legal protections of journalists under the 1st Amendment sweetloukillbot Aug 2013 #169
So what was the crime committed by Miranda? I would think that as a journalist you would sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #181
I'm not terribly familiar with British law but it is much less "free" than our law sweetloukillbot Aug 2013 #186
We have no way of knowing if he had classified files or not. The nyt reporter inserted Mojorabbit Aug 2013 #201
Why are you keeping on that point? sweetloukillbot Aug 2013 #226
Because it is a valid point, that's why. TM99 Aug 2013 #229
I'd think that if Greenwald felt he had been libeled by the Times in a doctored quote sweetloukillbot Aug 2013 #230
I disagree that Greenwald would be TM99 Aug 2013 #233
NYT totally botched the acorn questionseverything Aug 2013 #248
The Guardian did not "immediately" turn over copies eilen Aug 2013 #328
Different situation sweetloukillbot Aug 2013 #332
The Constitution does not give rights to specific classes of people, Maedhros Aug 2013 #295
Welcome to DU! Number23 Aug 2013 #333
I've been around for ages - I just never have anything to say n/t sweetloukillbot Aug 2013 #334
Well, I hope the unbreakable wall of ignorance you've encountered in this thread Number23 Aug 2013 #335
Thanks! n/t sweetloukillbot Aug 2013 #336
How do you feel about the Patriot Act? Do you think Pres Obama should use it to rhett o rick Aug 2013 #302
I actually despise the Patriot Act but don't see what it has to do with British law, sweetloukillbot Aug 2013 #305
funny that he's not a journalist and yeah let's have anybody traffic anything thru airports. Yay! uhnope Aug 2013 #59
you really don't believe in liberal western democracy, do you? Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #78
oh, another candidate for logic class. But liberal western democracy is rule of law uhnope Aug 2013 #180
liberal western democracy means a free, uninhibited and adversarial press - It means the right of Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #188
Good lord Egnever Aug 2013 #29
"warfle warfle derp" is more intelligent than any argument I have seen for the opposing ... dawg Aug 2013 #39
LOL so you think the first amendment gives you the right to posses stolen intelligence? Egnever Aug 2013 #42
Find another place to post then. morningfog Aug 2013 #47
Nah the entertainment value here is too high. Egnever Aug 2013 #48
Is that your call to make? Number23 Aug 2013 #106
Nope. Just a helpful suggestion. morningfog Aug 2013 #118
in that case, might i suggest that you follow your own suggestion? nt Bodhi BloodWave Aug 2013 #254
By all means, thank you. morningfog Aug 2013 #270
So, you think the government can just "classify" any and all information it deems inconvenient? dawg Aug 2013 #51
Then you better tell them to change the laws Egnever Aug 2013 #52
What laws? The secret ones? dawg Aug 2013 #60
Exactly right. And to see someone laughing about the demise of this experiment so joyfully... cui bono Aug 2013 #197
^^^ This righ here ^^^ WilliamPitt Aug 2013 #111
Of the people, by the people, for the people Celefin Aug 2013 #203
derp a derp progressoid Aug 2013 #318
They call themselves "Democrats", but they oppose the core values that Democrats should be upholding backscatter712 Aug 2013 #218
You will find plenty of people here to support such totalitarian tactics, I'm afraid. dawg Aug 2013 #35
I am just going to assume that everyone scolding me in this thread WilliamPitt Aug 2013 #37
Will ... dawg Aug 2013 #45
You know it's possible to hold two separate... one_voice Aug 2013 #49
Really. WilliamPitt Aug 2013 #63
Anger issues... one_voice Aug 2013 #70
Attack the person and not the argument WilliamPitt Aug 2013 #73
I didn't attack you... one_voice Aug 2013 #84
....'as if I stole your last potato chip'. Whisp Aug 2013 #312
Makes Sense, no...? truebrit71 Aug 2013 #237
So do you feel that the launch codes for the nuclear program need to be made public? VanillaRhapsody Aug 2013 #177
Uh... no. Celefin Aug 2013 #209
PLONK. sibelian Aug 2013 #286
Ya, and it was a LOT of hands Hydra Aug 2013 #55
when the façade of winning mattered more NuttyFluffers Aug 2013 #141
I used to think the term "authoritarian left" meant hardline communist types who unapologetically Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #72
OT somewhat but the hardline communists need civil liberties as much or more than anyone else, in HardTimes99 Aug 2013 #149
Forgive Them Will... They Haven't A Clue... WillyT Aug 2013 #50
Shame on you, Mr. Pitt michigandem58 Aug 2013 #56
Uh, no not raising my hand... tnlefty Aug 2013 #57
Question. Old and In the Way Aug 2013 #61
News flash.... HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #137
I believe Obama is the one who pushed to make all the BushCo illegal wiretapping "legal". cui bono Aug 2013 #199
if they are involved in criminal activity, then yes. Pretzel_Warrior Aug 2013 #68
So detaining them under a terrorism law is cool with you? WilliamPitt Aug 2013 #75
I'd have to have way more information before I could make a case one way or the other Pretzel_Warrior Aug 2013 #86
. WilliamPitt Aug 2013 #91
Awesome! backscatter712 Aug 2013 #219
What about journalists who embarrass "our" people? DirkGently Aug 2013 #80
Arrest all the leakers and journalists!! felix_numinous Aug 2013 #81
Arrest means a formal charge kenny blankenship Aug 2013 #90
This reminds me of the way Bush and Cheney outed Valerie Plame to retaliate against Joseph Wilson HardTimes99 Aug 2013 #128
Now that the illustrious defender of our civil liberties and our security Dianne Feinstein has HardTimes99 Aug 2013 #119
Third way, fourth way felix_numinous Aug 2013 #134
Government approved journalists OnyxCollie Aug 2013 #164
39 Raised Hands? or is it just Recommends.. confusing..n/t KoKo Aug 2013 #89
Great edits. dkf Aug 2013 #92
Thanks. WilliamPitt Aug 2013 #93
I agreed first time around but the warfle warfle is so perfect! dkf Aug 2013 #94
Stole it from South Park. WilliamPitt Aug 2013 #96
Recommended. DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2013 #100
kick nt Zorra Aug 2013 #112
Brilliant post and rhetorical tour de force. And your words of HardTimes99 Aug 2013 #123
I've seen the enemy. He is us. blkmusclmachine Aug 2013 #124
Wait a sec,...does Hannity call himself a "journalist"? Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2013 #129
. WilliamPitt Aug 2013 #132
That's O'Reilly.... Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2013 #146
When people place Politicians and Political Parties ahead of ideals enigmatic Aug 2013 #135
I get your point but I think this goes beyond the mere worship of politicians HardTimes99 Aug 2013 #140
I'm not surprised by it, sadly. enigmatic Aug 2013 #144
People like that treat act like they're in a sports bar. Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2013 #161
Well duh Will! Get your ass in the van! Rex Aug 2013 #139
Tonight they admitted it, they were joined at the hip nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #142
“News is what somebody somewhere wants to suppress; all the rest is advertising.” Lord Northcliffe Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2013 #143
K&fookingR! whatchamacallit Aug 2013 #145
My hand is not raised. nt awoke_in_2003 Aug 2013 #147
It will be STUNNING when the next republican is in the WH and the response for Safetykitten Aug 2013 #152
And the PATRIOT Act is patriotic. joshcryer Aug 2013 #154
Gotta luv the transparency JEB Aug 2013 #160
The fascists at Scotland Yard seem to disagree. moondust Aug 2013 #170
I forgot, in fiction, it's a great plot device, in real life it's damn scary nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #183
No shit. I guess no one remembers the Pentagon Papers. Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #185
I think we need to go back to Ichingcarpenter Aug 2013 #189
Oh my. I'd never seen this before: A legit public figure peeling back the PNAC onion. chimpymustgo Aug 2013 #227
The second video is Ichingcarpenter Aug 2013 #234
Thank you so much!! You really should repost these in an OP! chimpymustgo Aug 2013 #304
LOL..... thanks but Ichingcarpenter Aug 2013 #308
You might be right - but it IS Wes Clark, after all. Legit, with lots of fans here. chimpymustgo Aug 2013 #322
Well I think her reasoning Ichingcarpenter Aug 2013 #324
Thanks, I was the Wes Clark video, not the second one. Will do so later tonight!! chimpymustgo Aug 2013 #325
I agree except for "getting to be a bad habit around here"... cui bono Aug 2013 #190
Hand raised. Donald Ian Rankin Aug 2013 #195
... Whisp Aug 2013 #196
All in favour of scammers like GG, please raise your IQs. n/t Whisp Aug 2013 #198
You must feel so clever! burnodo Aug 2013 #211
It depends on what evidence there is treestar Aug 2013 #224
Will, can you imagine Woodward and Bernstein sending their spouses to meet Mark Felt? msanthrope Aug 2013 #225
Factually speaking, Carl got divorced right during the story breaking and after married Nora Ephron Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #239
Scott Ritter is married and the father of twin teenage girls. As he was Will's msanthrope Aug 2013 #259
Very good questions, but you probably won't get a reply Whisp Aug 2013 #313
That is an amazing, irrelevant and totally distracting straw man you are developing there. hueymahl Aug 2013 #281
No--it's a question. What reputable journalist expects his spouse to mule stolen documents msanthrope Aug 2013 #282
Hey, guess what, this is not fiction, this is not a game. hueymahl Aug 2013 #288
What victim? nt msanthrope Aug 2013 #289
Well played! TM99 Aug 2013 #285
Totally In Favor RobinA Aug 2013 #228
GG is "on the right". He is a Paul supporter. tridim Aug 2013 #231
You have successfully managed to completely, and entirely miss the point... truebrit71 Aug 2013 #235
Yes, people who run international scams usually don't have much of a point. tridim Aug 2013 #250
..and again...you miss the point of the OP truebrit71 Aug 2013 #261
I'm not going to K&R as the OP requests. tridim Aug 2013 #263
So it's okay to detain a "clown"s significant other if he's "being used"... truebrit71 Aug 2013 #266
by simply replying you are kicking the thread... Javaman Aug 2013 #271
Thank you, William. Jakes Progress Aug 2013 #247
How sad that we have a small, determined core of consistent pro-admin policy backers, who ARE... hlthe2b Aug 2013 #258
Truly stunned at the number of those here who have fallen for and enable W Bush's legacy. Fire Walk With Me Aug 2013 #260
It's depressing to see any Democrat support such a thing. nt DLevine Aug 2013 #262
K&R Solly Mack Aug 2013 #265
Journalists should get a pass on possession of stolen property? Maybe I should start a blog and RB TexLa Aug 2013 #276
My Gawd, the stupidity on this is mind boggling! TM99 Aug 2013 #283
Amazing, isn't it? n/t hlthe2b Aug 2013 #287
So you can just take a police car and scream "Why are you chasing me? It's my property!" RB TexLa Aug 2013 #293
re: Getting things like what "stolen property" is... cthulu2016 Aug 2013 #300
Sigh TM99 Aug 2013 #315
I'll miss out on discussing something with you. Sorry, no way to care. RB TexLa Aug 2013 #326
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ THIS ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ bvar22 Aug 2013 #296
This shouldn't even need to be said here of all places. Matariki Aug 2013 #279
Shouldn't you define the reason for the detention before presenting such a black/white proposition? George II Aug 2013 #303
Tell me again why we had to know that Progressive dog Aug 2013 #306
K&R woo me with science Aug 2013 #307
K&R! TeamPooka Aug 2013 #309
During the Revolution sulphurdunn Aug 2013 #327
The question no longer, "Is it fascism yet?" but..."How long has it been fascism?" joeybee12 Aug 2013 #329
If the said "Journalist" was USING jazzimov Aug 2013 #337
Will, you have a new child, jazzimov Aug 2013 #338
That's the stupidest goddam comment in this entire thread WilliamPitt Aug 2013 #340
Do many journalists use their spouse/partner... SidDithers Aug 2013 #339
Dear WilliamPitt... AsahinaKimi Aug 2013 #341
but it WAS "terrorism under veil of journalism"! MisterP Aug 2013 #342
"that the administration wasn't hip to this jive"....... 4bucksagallon Aug 2013 #343
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»All in favor of detaining...»Reply #283