Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)June: Hillary on Snowden's "outrageous behavior" [View all]
Hillary Clinton faults China on NSA leaker flight
MICHAEL R. BLOODJune 25, 2013
LOS ANGELES (AP) Hillary Rodham Clinton said Monday that China damaged its relationship with the U.S. by allowing National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden to flee from Hong Kong, despite a U.S. request to arrest him for extradition.
"That kind of action is not only detrimental to the U.S.-China relationship but it sets a bad precedent that could unravel the intricate international agreements about how countries respect the laws and particularly the extradition treaties," the former secretary of state and possible 2016 presidential contender told an audience in Los Angeles.
Clinton's remarks echoed criticism from White House officials that Hong Kong's refusal to detain Snowden had "unquestionably" hurt relations between the two countries. Hong Kong has a high degree of autonomy from the rest of China, although experts believe Beijing probably orchestrated Snowden's exit in an effort to remove an irritant in relations with the U.S.
Clinton said the former CIA employee engaged in "outrageous behavior" by releasing sensitive documents that he contends show privacy violations by an authoritarian government. Snowden is now in Russia, and the White House wants him sent to the U.S. to face espionage charges.
- more -
http://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-faults-china-nsa-leaker-flight-061609977.html
MICHAEL R. BLOODJune 25, 2013
LOS ANGELES (AP) Hillary Rodham Clinton said Monday that China damaged its relationship with the U.S. by allowing National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden to flee from Hong Kong, despite a U.S. request to arrest him for extradition.
"That kind of action is not only detrimental to the U.S.-China relationship but it sets a bad precedent that could unravel the intricate international agreements about how countries respect the laws and particularly the extradition treaties," the former secretary of state and possible 2016 presidential contender told an audience in Los Angeles.
Clinton's remarks echoed criticism from White House officials that Hong Kong's refusal to detain Snowden had "unquestionably" hurt relations between the two countries. Hong Kong has a high degree of autonomy from the rest of China, although experts believe Beijing probably orchestrated Snowden's exit in an effort to remove an irritant in relations with the U.S.
Clinton said the former CIA employee engaged in "outrageous behavior" by releasing sensitive documents that he contends show privacy violations by an authoritarian government. Snowden is now in Russia, and the White House wants him sent to the U.S. to face espionage charges.
- more -
http://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-faults-china-nsa-leaker-flight-061609977.html
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
As early as 2011, Greenwald explained how Hillary was a hypocrite and enemy of internet freedom
David Krout
Aug 2013
#10
Yes, and I believe that Greenwald's, Snowden's, and Manning's objective was more to harm
kelliekat44
Aug 2013
#48
You're responding for the other poster? Do you know that poster's opinion of Hillary's comment? n/t
ProSense
Aug 2013
#33
"I voted twice for Obama. I will vote twice for Hillary if she ends up being the Dem nominee twice."
ProSense
Aug 2013
#47
She's not confused. In addition to other past jobs, he is a former CIA employee.
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#65
WTF? The NY Times cites him as such, various other media, his own video, etc.
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#68
The folks who interpret the Constitution, i.e. Federal appellate courts, disagree.
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#66