General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: June: Hillary on Snowden's "outrageous behavior" [View all]cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)on any issue I can think of.
If there is a meaningful policy difference I can not name it.
But I have never seen the Snowden story as about Obama. I doubt that anyone in the 2008 primaries would have handled the wars or surveillance very differently, except Kucinich and Gravel who I consider too loony for the job.
There are a few folks whose interest in hating the NSA appears to be an extension of a general animus toward Obama. I am not one of those people and cannot speak for them.
I voted twice for Obama. I will vote twice for Hillary if she ends up being the Dem nominee twice.
And I will be morally disgusted by a lot of things she will do, as I am with a lot of things Obama does.
None of us asked for a two-party system, but we have one and Dems are better.
I suspect Hillary is a little worse on national security issues than Obama and have never thought for a moment she was on Snowden's side... and I doubt anyone thinks that.
Thus the recycling of old comments to disabuse people of notions that nobody has to begin with appears to be gratuitous shit-stirring, whatever your intent.
If you are trying to smoke out a handful of PUMA racist types (a few probably exist) then that's your game, and have at it. But it's a pretty wedgey game.