The ACLU and others have been trying to redefine the term whistleblower to include Snowden.

[cascadiance]

70. You continue to miss the point that what you say ISN'T the point!

The point of importance is what he provided us in terms of information of what the NSA has been doing that arguably is violating our civil liberties in violation of the 4th amendment. YOU and we should be looking at those documents. If there are points of contention, or Snowden asks us to trust his words or opinion without evidence to back them up, THEN you can question his credibility in measuring that information. But what he's provided us isn't really arguable in my book. And if there are arguments against this information being factual, THAT is what you should be focusing on and providing us information to question their validity, etc. Then you might have a LOT more respect here than you do now from so many that hear your constant interruptions. But since you and many with these same talking points here AVOID doing that, it tells us that you have NOTHING to contend with what was given us, and are continue to try playing Republican and corporatist tactics trying to distract us away from the real issues and trying to get us emotionally stirred up with those irrelevant issues.