Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: June: Hillary on Snowden's "outrageous behavior" [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)47. "I voted twice for Obama. I will vote twice for Hillary if she ends up being the Dem nominee twice."
I voted twice for Obama. I will vote twice for Hillary if she ends up being the Dem nominee twice.
And I will be morally disgusted by a lot of things she will do, as I am with a lot of things Obama does.
And I will be morally disgusted by a lot of things she will do, as I am with a lot of things Obama does.
That's good to know.
I suspect Hillary is a little worse on national security issues than Obama and have never thought for a moment she was on Snowden's side... and I doubt anyone thinks that.
Thus the recycling of old comments to disabuse people of notions that nobody has to begin with appears to be gratuitous shit-stirring, whatever your intent.
Thus the recycling of old comments to disabuse people of notions that nobody has to begin with appears to be gratuitous shit-stirring, whatever your intent.
Hmmm "old comments," huh? Her two-month old opinion on this issue is just extremely relevant. The fact that you consider posting it "shit-stirring" tells me that seeing it posted bothers you more than you admit.
If you are trying to smoke out a handful of PUMA racist types (a few probably exist) then that's your game, and have at it. But it's a pretty wedgey game.
Um, WTF are you talking about? Again, that bizarre deflection tells me you're bother more about seeing Hillary's opinion posted than you admit.
Also, I find it highly disingenouous that someone who posted this (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023494658) would accuse anyone of "driving a wedge into OUR Party," especially in response to posting Hillary's opinion.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
As early as 2011, Greenwald explained how Hillary was a hypocrite and enemy of internet freedom
David Krout
Aug 2013
#10
Yes, and I believe that Greenwald's, Snowden's, and Manning's objective was more to harm
kelliekat44
Aug 2013
#48
You're responding for the other poster? Do you know that poster's opinion of Hillary's comment? n/t
ProSense
Aug 2013
#33
"I voted twice for Obama. I will vote twice for Hillary if she ends up being the Dem nominee twice."
ProSense
Aug 2013
#47
She's not confused. In addition to other past jobs, he is a former CIA employee.
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#65
WTF? The NY Times cites him as such, various other media, his own video, etc.
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#68
The folks who interpret the Constitution, i.e. Federal appellate courts, disagree.
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#66