Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
40. USA-USA-USA
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 09:23 AM
Feb 2012

Geez, you sound like the rest of the jingoist idiots in this country. Full of piss and vinegar, willing to kill others for no good reason.

Have you ever been to war? Have you ever cowered in fear as the bombs fell? Somehow I doubt it, otherwise you wouldn't be so consign others to death.

You don't get it, much like most of America doesn't get it, still doesn't get it, even though we've had our asses kicked, our noses rubbed in this type of shit before.

We are fighting in a battle of ideas, not bullets, but instead we brought an army to this battle of ideas, and are consequently losing this fight. You don't win a battle of ideas by killing people, but by coming up with better ideas. We faced this situation once before, in Vietnam, and we lost, badly.

Every person we kill means we're losing this war of ideas, because every death means that another person, at least, is turned against us. You don't win wars of ideas with bullets, but ideas(I suggest you read the Ugly American, an old, but still relevant classic). Sure, we can scorch the earth and call it peace, but all we're doing is creating problems for ourselves in the future. Have you no since of history? Why do you think these people are attacking us to begin with? Oh, yeah, because we've been fucking around in that part of the world for decades, killing innocents and destroying countries. You think that more of the same is going to solve the problem? You are woefully ignorant on this situation.

Two million dollars. $2,000,000. That is how much it would cost to prevent 911. Looking back, would you have paid two million dollars to prevent 911? You see, we used the Afghan people, the mujahideen, to fight our proxy war against the Soviets back in the late seventies and early eighties. We provided them with arms, supplies and money, but little humanitarian aid. Still these people(including bin Laden), fought on and beat the Soviets. Once the peace held, we left, left the Afghan people to bury their dead, left them to rebuild their country, which had been blown back to the Stone Age.

The mujahideen wanted, needed help, and turned to the US. But we wouldn't give it to them. The act that really pissed off bin Laden, the one thing that turned him against the West, was school funding. We, the richest country in the world, the one outside country who had benefited the most from the Afghan victory, refused to loosen our purse strings and provide two million dollars in order to build schools.

Two million dollars would have won that battle of ideas, and done immense good, bought immense good will. But instead we snapped the purse shut, pissing off bin Laden in the process, along with millions of Afghans. And setting the wheels in motion for 911. Action, reaction, cause, effect. When you are fighting a war of ideas, you need to consider the future ramifications of your actions.

We're still involved in that war of ideas, and we're still losing it badly. The only way we can win, the only way we can stop terrorism, is to stop the killing. Stop turning people against us out of rage and anger. Stop the killing, apologize for what we've done, and try to make amends.

Your portrayal of who we're fighting is woefully inaccurate. We aren't fighting "fascist terrorist&quot whatever that is), but rather ordinary human beings who suddenly find themselves being invaded by a much larger military power. After all, the actual number of al Qaeda, the actual number of the Taliban at the beginning of this war was laughingly small. Less than two thousand people all told. Yet we have unleashed our full military might on this country. What would you do if you were in their shoes? Oh, yeah, like most people, you would join the military and fight back. We're not talking terrorists here, we're talking about people fighting for their country. In fact, the Afghan people would, justifiably so, call us the terrorist, since we invade their country without good reason, use "Shock and Awe" to terrorize the people, and proceed to kill innocents and destroy a country, all for what? To bring justice to a literal handful of people? Sounds like terror to me.

And again, citing what political leaders, and even the brainwashed masses of American people, believe doesn't justify what we've done. After all, military and political leaders alike, Republican and Democrat, supported the Vietnam war for far too long. And the American people, well hell, just a few short years ago they voted a congenital idiot back into the highest office in the land.

Sadly however, you are like far too many Americans, ignorant of our history, ignorant of other people, and in possession of only one answer to any problems, the military. The trouble is, when the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a nail.

I suggest that you educate yourself, equip yourself with some other tools, so that you can start truly discerning what our problems are.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

One civilian killed is one too many. Cali_Democrat Feb 2012 #1
Civilians always die in war WonderGrunion Feb 2012 #20
That's one dead civilian for every four dead militants. Comrade Grumpy Feb 2012 #2
In World War II the ratio was 1 civilian for every 2 dead soldiers for the Axis powers Johnny Rico Feb 2012 #12
the very serious problem wth your analogy is that most of the civilians that were truedelphi Feb 2012 #25
How does that affect kill ratios and whether they are bad or good? You dont really explain that. nt stevenleser Feb 2012 #53
What? What? What? truedelphi Feb 2012 #64
How do they differentiate between dead militants and dead civilians? Incitatus Feb 2012 #3
You are asking how the people who lived there knew who was who?Because that is who provided the info stevenleser Feb 2012 #51
Wow, they're really reaching now, aren't they? gratuitous Feb 2012 #4
I have long called the AP truedelphi Feb 2012 #24
Speaking to the villagers where the attacks happened is reaching? stevenleser Feb 2012 #52
Those darn treaties! gratuitous Feb 2012 #62
Phew! That's a relief!! RufusTFirefly Feb 2012 #5
Not sure why people have a hard time believing there are some hardcore terrorist groups limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #6
So we should just continue to kill people, MadHound Feb 2012 #7
We should defend our country from fascist terrorists who are plotting to kill us. limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #10
fascist terrorists?! frylock Feb 2012 #13
You don't agree? limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #14
You're right - there's nothing funny about the Republican party. Nostradammit Feb 2012 #16
I do see the resemblance. limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #22
Targeted assassinations that allow for the murder of innocents IS TERRORISM! Nostradammit Feb 2012 #33
OK so what would be a better way to approach the issue? limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #35
Well, if we are to stay true to the original intent of the people who started this country Nostradammit Feb 2012 #37
All due respect to you, there is no such thing as war without civilian deaths. stevenleser Feb 2012 #58
Did Congress declare war on Pakistan? Nostradammit Feb 2012 #61
No, actually, in wartime, it is neither murder, nor terrorism. stevenleser Feb 2012 #60
Yes, maybe we should stop combatting terrorist groups in the region. Comrade Grumpy Feb 2012 #36
Sounds like we should be sending drones to hit the Catholic Bishops, then. MNBrewer Feb 2012 #21
clearly, i don't.. frylock Feb 2012 #43
This thread limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #48
You are going to get a very simplistic and superficial response if at all. stevenleser Feb 2012 #56
thanks limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #59
you're right. let's just continue to utilize the same costly and ineffective methods.. frylock Feb 2012 #63
USA-USA-USA MadHound Feb 2012 #40
I think I disagree with your position on drone strikes. limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #45
Geez, where to start MadHound Feb 2012 #49
ok so... limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #50
Why are they trying to kill us? Hugabear Feb 2012 #66
Here are some reasons why limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #67
I really don't get why otherwise sensible people believe this horseshit eridani Mar 2012 #69
It's easy to understand if you think those terrorist groups pose a real threat. limpyhobbler Mar 2012 #71
If they wanted to violently spread religion-- eridani Mar 2012 #72
That is what they want. That's what they say and I believe them. limpyhobbler Mar 2012 #73
Our own 1% is the real threat to us, not religious whackjobs. eridani Mar 2012 #74
In one word, yes. bluestate10 Feb 2012 #28
Who are the savages? MadHound Feb 2012 #42
killing for peace.. frylock Feb 2012 #44
I guess that is sarcasm? limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #46
Obama, Clinton, Panetta, and Petraeus? Aren't they the ones who escalated the war? Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2012 #9
It's always easy to think the way you do if you truedelphi Feb 2012 #27
I appreciate your thoughtful response. limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #29
When we're attacked, then we should wage war. truedelphi Feb 2012 #31
Yes! Nostradammit Feb 2012 #34
I love your user id name. truedelphi Feb 2012 #65
I knew you were going to say that. Nostradammit Mar 2012 #68
We were attacked by a multistate terror group on 9-11 why did you choose not to address that? stevenleser Feb 2012 #57
They can tell they're "militants" because they're dead. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2012 #8
Apparently they asked the local people to find out. limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #17
At that time, they also claimed to kill only insurgents. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2012 #18
Well, that's a good point. limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #26
It poses an insignifican "threat" to America, except that it's bankrupting us. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2012 #32
little evidence remains for this: quaker bill Mar 2012 #75
So it sounds like we need to take steps to change both reality and perception n/t DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2012 #11
Except we can't. Igel Feb 2012 #15
Good read. (nt) Robb Feb 2012 #38
Yes, well said, and to extend your analogy, people here insist on superficial interpretations stevenleser Feb 2012 #55
Spinning the death machine. marmar Feb 2012 #19
Authorized Propaganda, spinning? Don't be so cynical. EFerrari Feb 2012 #23
These numbers are worse than what the Bureau of Investigative Journalism found. joshcryer Feb 2012 #30
It's interesting that some are reflexively attacking the article with no backup whatsoever stevenleser Feb 2012 #54
The real problem here fujiyama Feb 2012 #39
... woo me with science Feb 2012 #41
Oh f*ck me with a spoon. GeorgeGist Feb 2012 #47
In every person advocating for the "war" on terror, by whatever means-- eridani Mar 2012 #70
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»AP IMPACT: study suggests...»Reply #40