General Discussion

The Link

(757 posts)

65. You are clearly a "liberal" and a "progressive"

Reply to Cryptoad (Reply #43)

Tue Aug 20, 2013, 05:58 PM

Aug 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

72 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rachel: "Letting our closest allies do it while we stand silent is the same thing as us doing it" [View all] markpkessinger Aug 2013 OP

Where ever we are..... daleanime Aug 2013 #1

Sometimes what we see is shocking polynomial Aug 2013 #2

Perhaps mimi85 Aug 2013 #3

Let him fly into this country Cryptoad Aug 2013 #18

Kick and rec - it was a tremendous segment. Cooley Hurd Aug 2013 #4

Saw it last night & agree it was a tremendous segment! Little Star Aug 2013 #6

Notice the Administration refuses to say whether the seized information morningfog Aug 2013 #5

Only Murdock newpapers are legit with legit journalist. which is why bonniebgood Aug 2013 #7

But we no longer have Fox having a monopoly of middle eastern owned media here... cascadiance Aug 2013 #8

Hear! Hear! another_liberal Aug 2013 #14

Bullshit treestar Aug 2013 #9

You need a laugh track here Bragi Aug 2013 #11

The Truth Cryptoad Aug 2013 #19

Journalism is now equal to "terrorism"? What next criticism of the corporate-military state?? Civilization2 Aug 2013 #20

I think she is right. n/t secondwind Aug 2013 #10

Tell them like it is! another_liberal Aug 2013 #12

Note the absence of the usual suspects Bragi Aug 2013 #13

Look upthread. It just now turned 8am on the east coast. Cerridwen Aug 2013 #15

Sorry Rachel, that is old America think, we are now in new amurka. MyNameGoesHere Aug 2013 #16

Oh me!!! Cryptoad Aug 2013 #17

Since when has Greenwald been charged with theft? n/t markpkessinger Aug 2013 #22

Never said he was,,,, Cryptoad Aug 2013 #39

You said, he was "the 'partner' of a known thief" markpkessinger Aug 2013 #42

That be Greewald,,,,,, Cryptoad Aug 2013 #55

Greenwald has received stolen documents from a whistleblower . . . markpkessinger Aug 2013 #60

Sorry,,,,, Cryptoad Aug 2013 #61

Right -- SNOWDEN, not GREENWALD n/t markpkessinger Aug 2013 #62

You are a thief Cryptoad Aug 2013 #63

You might be guilty of receiving stolen goods . . . markpkessinger Aug 2013 #64

not much differences Cryptoad Aug 2013 #69

The "partner". Pretty transparent. The Link Aug 2013 #25

Of what? nt Cryptoad Aug 2013 #43

You are clearly a "liberal" and a "progressive" The Link Aug 2013 #65

Are you down to Cryptoad Aug 2013 #67

Just quoting...geez. The Link Aug 2013 #68

Quoting what? Cryptoad Aug 2013 #71

what the fuck is a "know thief",,,,,,,,????? DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2013 #26

That is called a typo Cryptoad Aug 2013 #46

What's with the square quotes around the word partner? markpkessinger Aug 2013 #29

Its a quote,,,,,, geez Cryptoad Aug 2013 #50

What's with the quotes around partner? NuclearDem Aug 2013 #31

just quoting,,,,,,geez nt Cryptoad Aug 2013 #53

Sadly, I've gotten bashed mercilessly in the past for making the exact same point Blue_Tires Aug 2013 #21

knr Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #23

Telling our closest allies what they can and can't do is called dictatorship. JaneyVee Aug 2013 #24

Lame. /nt Marr Aug 2013 #28

Right, except when everyone uses it to defend other countries, such as JaneyVee Aug 2013 #30

Lame. Marr Aug 2013 #33

But you agree that we are not the UK, right? JaneyVee Aug 2013 #36

You're asking me if I agree that the United States is not the United Kingdom? Marr Aug 2013 #38

Ok, two points NuclearDem Aug 2013 #40

Well said! n/t markpkessinger Aug 2013 #47

Good points. But the UK gave us a heads up as they were about to detain him. JaneyVee Aug 2013 #48

When did we conquer the UK? jeff47 Aug 2013 #27

I thought the US has no right to bully othercountries and tell them what to do? Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #32

Nobody has suggested the U.S. should have "bullied" the U.K. . . . markpkessinger Aug 2013 #37

So in this instance, it would have been OK to tell a sovereign country what to do.... Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #41

Are you saying the U.S. government can never voice an objection . . . markpkessinger Aug 2013 #45

Of course the US can voice an objection Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #56

I think people have a problem with the U.S. telling other countries what to do under threat of force markpkessinger Aug 2013 #70

that's when they think they're doing it. When they don't do it.. it's called Cha Aug 2013 #54

Bingo. n/t Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #57

+1! nt sheshe2 Aug 2013 #66

I expect more nuanced reporting from Rachel n/t War Horse Aug 2013 #34

She is right. The government's actions are proving the claims being made about them. liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #35

So should we invade the UK? Rachel, your my girl...but not on this. nt kelliekat44 Aug 2013 #44

that's quite a leap. Those are really the only two options? Either never criticize other liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #49

No invasion required nor suggested in Rachel's segment . . . markpkessinger Aug 2013 #52

Under the bus with you!!!!! Rex Aug 2013 #51

Oh, and move over kids: we gotta make room for Rachel under this bus! DJ13 Aug 2013 #58

I see nothing wrong with letting Airstrip One handle this markiv Aug 2013 #59

K&R idwiyo Aug 2013 #72