Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: No. No no. NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO!!!!!!! [View all]treestar
(82,383 posts)22. And it was always noticeable that the same birthers
Did not require to see any of the documents! They wanted to see Obama's, but never McLame's, not his BC showing his birth in Panama nor his parents' proof of American citizenship.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
But "journalists" who keep reporting the birther nonsense are untouchable....right? nt
kelliekat44
Aug 2013
#32
i thought i was basically agreeing with the op, so i don't know what you're disagreeing with.
unblock
Aug 2013
#56
Which is exactly the situation they claimed meant Obama was not a natural born citizen!
treestar
Aug 2013
#89
I don't know all the legalities involved with being a US citizen born abroad.
mysuzuki2
Aug 2013
#49
perfectly said and agree. on my issues, cannot allow any shifting into lie or myth
seabeyond
Aug 2013
#67
K&R! There is zero legitimacy for those disputing the facts of Obama's birth & citizenship.
backscatter712
Aug 2013
#78