Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WikiLeaks says Bradley Manning jail term is 'strategic victory' [View all]phleshdef
(11,936 posts)1. Yea well, victory for them, he gets to be their patsy.
I agree that Manning deserves prison time for what he did because he went beyond exposing illegal activities. But at the same time, I see him as an emotionally troubled individual that Wikileaks took advantage of. Assange and his ilk are scum, hiding behind the noble notions of transparency in order to make a name for themselves. And they don't care who they take advantage of to do it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
OK, I missed it. What exactly "illegal" did Manning expose? Serious question because all links to
kelliekat44
Aug 2013
#50
Well, Julian should stay in his embassy cubicle until Manning feels the sun on his face again, IMO.
MADem
Aug 2013
#2
I'm not "going after" anyone, but I spent 2003-2009 calling for Bush's impeachment.
phleshdef
Aug 2013
#16
The reference is to the defense and Manning not to any kind of victory for Wikileaks.
Luminous Animal
Aug 2013
#32
That's it, precisely. He's a little piglet for attention--it's noxiously obvious.
MADem
Aug 2013
#47
Who's sliming Manning? Jesus, you love to make shit up and insert unrelated crap into threads.
MADem
Aug 2013
#30
"This hard-won minimum term represents a significant tactical victory for Bradley Manning’s defense"
ProSense
Aug 2013
#23
James Blond is okay with 35 years? One can only hope that comes back to bite
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#27
I'll take a Swedish prison sentence of comparable length. As Prosence pointed out, now
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#33
Can you show me how much Wikileaks money went to Manning Legal Defense Fund?
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#38
Right--show me how much money Wikileaks gave to Manning's IOLTA Legal Defense Fund--the
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#45
The last I heard, the Wau Holland Foundation, allowed Wikileaks to donate $15,000.
Luminous Animal
Aug 2013
#51
15 k from wikileaks, and Courage to Resist spent 75% of donations on 'expenses' not legal fees???
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#53
You haven't a clue what they do. Yes. Advertising. Prior to Courage to Resists campaigns on
Luminous Animal
Aug 2013
#54
How does an organization collecting for his 'defense' spent 75% of the money on things that are not
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#55
Believe it or not, being able to support Manning's defense also includes raising awareness of his
Luminous Animal
Aug 2013
#58
It takes 75% of 1.2 million to do that? This sounds to me like a huge Ponzi scheme.....
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#66
Wikileaks is praising the work of the defense. The comment wasn't about Wikileaks...
Luminous Animal
Aug 2013
#34
Wikileaks is full of shit. Manning isn't getting out with minimum time because he
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#37
That's not minimum time, my dear Luminous. And I bet if you asked Col. Morris would Manning's
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#43
He won't if the feds still want his testimony. Refusal to help the authorities is a strike
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#49
You should see me on behalf of my clients. Here, I have a TOS that binds me. nt
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#56