Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
1. Yea well, victory for them, he gets to be their patsy.
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 01:08 PM
Aug 2013

I agree that Manning deserves prison time for what he did because he went beyond exposing illegal activities. But at the same time, I see him as an emotionally troubled individual that Wikileaks took advantage of. Assange and his ilk are scum, hiding behind the noble notions of transparency in order to make a name for themselves. And they don't care who they take advantage of to do it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yea well, victory for them, he gets to be their patsy. phleshdef Aug 2013 #1
Are you a patsy? RobertEarl Aug 2013 #3
Doing a good thing doesn't erase doing a bad thing. phleshdef Aug 2013 #5
Sure you would RobertEarl Aug 2013 #11
LOL, you don't see me doing anything. You don't know me. phleshdef Aug 2013 #14
I gotta say Lee-Lee Aug 2013 #13
That's been my position for a while now. riqster Aug 2013 #29
And you sound like leftynyc Aug 2013 #39
I agree Johonny Aug 2013 #7
OK, I missed it. What exactly "illegal" did Manning expose? Serious question because all links to kelliekat44 Aug 2013 #50
This pretty much sums up my view... one_voice Aug 2013 #61
Well, Julian should stay in his embassy cubicle until Manning feels the sun on his face again, IMO. MADem Aug 2013 #2
He sacrificed for you and all of us RobertEarl Aug 2013 #4
You have a lot of nerve lecturing anyone ProSense Aug 2013 #6
Praise tea baggers? RobertEarl Aug 2013 #9
No, you were praising teabaggers ProSense Aug 2013 #10
LOL, yea, that Bradley Manning, a modern day Jesus... phleshdef Aug 2013 #8
What are you smoking? RobertEarl Aug 2013 #12
I'm not "going after" anyone, but I spent 2003-2009 calling for Bush's impeachment. phleshdef Aug 2013 #16
you are getting a little better at this... snooper2 Aug 2013 #18
No he didn't. Nice speech, though. MADem Aug 2013 #28
Manning did, but Assange operates out of sheer ego. n/t pnwmom Aug 2013 #48
That's what a hero does leftynyc Aug 2013 #41
He was actually the... one_voice Aug 2013 #63
Concur--and he, of all of 'em, had the biggest personal issues. MADem Aug 2013 #64
Okay just lost all respect for Wiki Rex Aug 2013 #15
The reference is to the defense and Manning not to any kind of victory for Wikileaks. Luminous Animal Aug 2013 #32
Thank you! Rex Aug 2013 #57
I know. Le Taz Hot Aug 2013 #59
You don't think there is a reason for it do you? Rex Aug 2013 #60
Nah, 'cause that would mean there's an agenda Le Taz Hot Aug 2013 #62
Yep, more raining coming in too. Rex Aug 2013 #65
"It's not ABOUT Manning! It's about ME, Julian Assange!" struggle4progress Aug 2013 #17
What the hell are you talking about? Luminous Animal Aug 2013 #24
That's it, precisely. He's a little piglet for attention--it's noxiously obvious. MADem Aug 2013 #47
uh oh. bunnies Aug 2013 #19
Notice the posters here sliming Manning RobertEarl Aug 2013 #20
Most of the posters ProSense Aug 2013 #22
Who's sliming Manning? Jesus, you love to make shit up and insert unrelated crap into threads. MADem Aug 2013 #30
LOL! n/t ProSense Aug 2013 #67
Full statement by Julian Assange Luminous Animal Aug 2013 #21
"This hard-won minimum term represents a significant tactical victory for Bradley Manning’s defense" ProSense Aug 2013 #23
It's all about Julian.....and 35 years is a long, hard sentence. nt msanthrope Aug 2013 #25
Saved from releasing the "insurance" files. n/t ProSense Aug 2013 #26
James Blond is okay with 35 years? One can only hope that comes back to bite msanthrope Aug 2013 #27
I hope he's in the Embassy for at least as long as Manning is in the pokey. MADem Aug 2013 #31
I'll take a Swedish prison sentence of comparable length. As Prosence pointed out, now msanthrope Aug 2013 #33
You can donate via the Wikileaks site here: Luminous Animal Aug 2013 #36
Can you show me how much Wikileaks money went to Manning Legal Defense Fund? msanthrope Aug 2013 #38
The Defense Fund is here (which Wikileaks links to) Luminous Animal Aug 2013 #44
Right--show me how much money Wikileaks gave to Manning's IOLTA Legal Defense Fund--the msanthrope Aug 2013 #45
The last I heard, the Wau Holland Foundation, allowed Wikileaks to donate $15,000. Luminous Animal Aug 2013 #51
15 k from wikileaks, and Courage to Resist spent 75% of donations on 'expenses' not legal fees??? msanthrope Aug 2013 #53
You haven't a clue what they do. Yes. Advertising. Prior to Courage to Resists campaigns on Luminous Animal Aug 2013 #54
How does an organization collecting for his 'defense' spent 75% of the money on things that are not msanthrope Aug 2013 #55
Believe it or not, being able to support Manning's defense also includes raising awareness of his Luminous Animal Aug 2013 #58
It takes 75% of 1.2 million to do that? This sounds to me like a huge Ponzi scheme..... msanthrope Aug 2013 #66
No he's not fucking okay with 35 years. Luminous Animal Aug 2013 #35
Why are you carping at me about what that idiot thinks? MADem Aug 2013 #42
Wikileaks is praising the work of the defense. The comment wasn't about Wikileaks... Luminous Animal Aug 2013 #34
Wikileaks is full of shit. Manning isn't getting out with minimum time because he msanthrope Aug 2013 #37
I trust Col. Morris Davis's (Gitmo chief prosecuter) Luminous Animal Aug 2013 #40
That's not minimum time, my dear Luminous. And I bet if you asked Col. Morris would Manning's msanthrope Aug 2013 #43
You claimed that he won't get parole. Col. Davis disagrees. Luminous Animal Aug 2013 #46
He won't if the feds still want his testimony. Refusal to help the authorities is a strike msanthrope Aug 2013 #49
Awful demanding, ain't ya? Luminous Animal Aug 2013 #52
You should see me on behalf of my clients. Here, I have a TOS that binds me. nt msanthrope Aug 2013 #56
Assange is a sleazy attention whore JI7 Aug 2013 #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WikiLeaks says Bradley Ma...»Reply #1