Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Whistle Blower gets 35 years. When do we get to the War Criminals he exposed? [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)122. Something has to change in the way we elect people to office. One thing we can do is
to put all our efforts and donations into the candidates, directly, that we want. Never donate again to any Pac that decides who the money should go to. And never again fall for the garbage that electing a 'someone who has a chance to win v someone you want but doesn't have a chance to win'. I will not listen that that nonsense ever again.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
149 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Whistle Blower gets 35 years. When do we get to the War Criminals he exposed? [View all]
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
OP
But if it happened during the Bush era, there would not be a single supporter of this outrage.
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#7
Yea I know, and i don't think they care. Support at all costs, screw morals and beliefs. n/t
1awake
Aug 2013
#8
They don't, they have zero capacity to empathize with other human beings. How we ever allowed
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#81
I agree, but having tried to do that for over a decade now, I haven't seen much progress. Still
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#87
Kudos for trying. There have been a few break throughs, the Freedom Fries Congressman eg
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#116
Absolutely. I am sorry about your losses, it is heart-breaking to think how many wonderful lives
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#144
Blind loyalty to any politician, Barack Obama or anyone else is very destructive IMO.
totodeinhere
Aug 2013
#49
If you think 35 years is merciful I'd hate to see your definition of what he deserved. And
1awake
Aug 2013
#137
Yes, the person who exposed war crimes should get life while the War Criminals are being
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#143
That was the first warning we had of how things were going to be. She never explained that
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#90
She never responds to questions about that. People do ask her at protests etc, she gets
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#98
He's a hero no matter what they do to him. This will likely only make him more of a hero
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#6
Seems our current Dem. Adminstration does indeed want to defend the Bush war criimes:
dixiegrrrrl
Aug 2013
#10
Amazing that we once thought that if we elected democrats things would begin to change.
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#12
What we failed to realize is that they can be bribed with loads of campaign cash just like Repugs!
Dustlawyer
Aug 2013
#59
Absolutely, you are 100% correct imo. Public funding, every candidate has the same
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#83
Didn't see that yet, but it is being noted around the Internet that the War Criminals have yet to
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#30
That should be posted all over the country. Concise and to the point and true.
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#121
Here's a photo of them, I would say they are obscenley wealthy, but I could be wrong:
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#31
The day we get to the war criminals, I'll be right there with my knitting needles
Catherina
Aug 2013
#25
deFarge joke or Demolition Man joke? but I wonder how many years Old Gimlet Eye would've gotten
MisterP
Aug 2013
#76
So far, it looks like we'll have to wait until we can get some Real Democrats to replace the
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#96
Behring Breivik killed 77 children, got less time. My Lai massacre got less time
Catherina
Aug 2013
#101
one problem is the war criminals you reference have incredibly good lawyers, know how to line up
KittyWampus
Aug 2013
#26
One little thing they have that you forgot. They have the US Government protecting them,
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#33
So was Ellsberg. Your point is what? Bush and Cheney were guilty too, although I'd still
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#120
The hits just keep on comin'. If "Democrats" nominate another neocon for President
Zorra
Aug 2013
#48
Something has to change in the way we elect people to office. One thing we can do is
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#122
People have lost trust. A people's pac is a possibility, so long as the money only goes to
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#135
I am calling upon President Barack Obama to issue a full pardon to Bradley
totodeinhere
Aug 2013
#44
Anyone who calls Manning a traitor is supporting the protection of Bush war criminals.
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#52
Yes, it was, as expected. And it's ludicrous to the use the argument that 'military takes these
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#71
Yes, I'm going to find the petition for the Nobel Peace Prize for Manning and start
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#58
Unfortunately Manning doesn't have the kind of power and money it takes to buy his freedom. Bush and
liberal_at_heart
Aug 2013
#54
That clearly is the elephant in the room that both the defenders of the vindictive punishment of any
Dragonfli
Aug 2013
#72
Whether they are doing it consciously or unconsciously, when they agree to silence and
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#124
You're not alone on that anymore.. I am hearing this from more and more people on both
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#129
They were distracted by trivia. 'Did you see what Limbaugh said today about Liberals'
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#136
Unbelievable. I am going to have to bookmark this because that very Amendment is the same one that
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#142
More and more people are beginning to see that. They are getting careless. For a while we
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#80
Blind greed and lust for power. They don't see or care about anything but controlling the
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#104
That is pure BS. See Drake and Binney. whose revelations should have sparked
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#103
No - he was persecuted for leaking information to a reporter. Which is illegal.
hack89
Aug 2013
#138
Backtracking now? You said that the way to go was to follow the Whistle Blower Protection rules.
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#145
Maybe you should look at the people who did everything according to the rules of the Whistle
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#148
Ever heard the saying, "Justice may be blind, but it can smell money"? n/t
winter is coming
Aug 2013
#97
Good Question and what about the Torturers...the Multi-National Corporations..the
KoKo
Aug 2013
#110
That's what every Democrat should do next time. If, and I can't see it not happening, they
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#125
The Obama Administration is going full speed ahead on prosecutions under the Espionage Act.
totodeinhere
Aug 2013
#131
Sometimes I read comments like that from Obama, which is why I supported him. Then
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#132