Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gothmog

(181,771 posts)
7. Talking Points Memo has good explanation as to why Texas was first
Thu Aug 22, 2013, 04:02 PM
Aug 2013
http://editors.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2013/08/north_carolina_next.php

It seems pretty clear that the Justice Department is testing out the extent of its powers under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act against Texas first because Texas is a much stronger case. It’s not easy to prove intentional discrimination, which is the bar that DOJ must now meet, since the Supreme Court’s June decision that Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act was unconstitutional. But lucky for DOJ, a federal court has already ruled in an earlier case that a Texas redistricting map was deliberately discriminatory. That gives DOJ a leg up as it argues that Texas should be subjected to stricter oversight under the law. Today’s new effort by DOJ to block the Texas voter ID law follows the same basic theory.


It is hard to prove intentional discrimination and there were judicial findings of discrimination in the Texas cases. The DOJ will have an easier time in Texas but it appears clear that North Carolina will be targeted.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Department of Justice to ...»Reply #7