Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: “There is a cult of ignorance in the United States..." [View all]Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)85. "Mencken had built his career as a sharp-tongued opponent to all such established orthodoxies."
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=32241
(emphasis added)
The Scopes trial gave Mencken a perfect opportunity to vent his spleen against the foibles of the U.S. masses. He concluded that most U.S. citizens remained Homo Neanderthalensis (p. 11). The problem at the root of the Scopes trial, Mencken argued, was that the great majority of men consistently and stupidly fought against every step in human progress (p. 12). At times, Menckens raw elitism still has power to shock. In denouncing the lower orders, who supported antievolution laws, he explained that the human race is divided into two sharply differentiated and mutually antagonistic classes, almost genera (pp. 13, 16). To Mencken, the great unwashed needed more than just a bath; they almost represented a lower species entirely.
For all his scorn of biblical literalists, Mencken defended the right of every person to believe in inanity, in imbecilities (p. 120). However, these essays show the limits Mencken placed on those rights. No person, no matter how stupidly devoted to religion, could be allowed to inflict [those beliefs] upon other men by force.... He has no right to demand that they be treated as sacred (p. 120). For Mencken, this was the crux of the issue in Dayton. The Scopes trial served as a showdown between the enlightened, secular few and the masses with their simian gabble (p. 129).
Thus, Mencken had no truck with the notion that education should be rooted in the culture and experiences of children. He did not agree that schooling should be germane to childrens lives outside of school. Rather, these essays reveal that Mencken determined to use education as a weapon to combat U.S. citizens stubborn and intractable small-mindedness. For Mencken, there was a right answer. It lay in the spread of secular civilization and enlightenment. Education was the only hope to cure backward peoples of their inferior ways.
For all his scorn of biblical literalists, Mencken defended the right of every person to believe in inanity, in imbecilities (p. 120). However, these essays show the limits Mencken placed on those rights. No person, no matter how stupidly devoted to religion, could be allowed to inflict [those beliefs] upon other men by force.... He has no right to demand that they be treated as sacred (p. 120). For Mencken, this was the crux of the issue in Dayton. The Scopes trial served as a showdown between the enlightened, secular few and the masses with their simian gabble (p. 129).
Thus, Mencken had no truck with the notion that education should be rooted in the culture and experiences of children. He did not agree that schooling should be germane to childrens lives outside of school. Rather, these essays reveal that Mencken determined to use education as a weapon to combat U.S. citizens stubborn and intractable small-mindedness. For Mencken, there was a right answer. It lay in the spread of secular civilization and enlightenment. Education was the only hope to cure backward peoples of their inferior ways.
(emphasis added)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
99 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Mencken had built his career as a sharp-tongued opponent to all such established orthodoxies."
Bernardo de La Paz
Aug 2013
#85
Advertising and Branding has Reached a Pinnacle ...And it needs to get Taken Down...
KoKo
Aug 2013
#81
Many thanks for the reference, I am not familiar with this author!
Rebellious Republican
Aug 2013
#30
But... dinosaurs and man coexisted! Only 4 elements! Pi is exactly 3! Teach the controversy!
ck4829
Aug 2013
#50
Unfortunately, hfojvt wrote "You wanna call her stupid and you might just lose some teeth." nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Aug 2013
#69
The discussion is not about strawberry shortcake vs. thermodynamics.
Bernardo de La Paz
Aug 2013
#68
When 29% of Louisiana Republicans surveyed blame Obama for the poor response to hurricane Katrina,
tclambert
Aug 2013
#88
My favorite photo of Asimov is of him sitting in an armchair built out of his many,many books.
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#84