Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Larry Summers and the 'End Game' memo [View all]antigop
(12,778 posts)76. How the TPP will impact financial regulations
http://www.exposethetpp.org/TPPImpacts_FinRegulation.html
The TPP would provide big banks with a backdoor means of rolling back efforts to re-regulate Wall Street in the wake of the global economic crisis.
The deal would require domestic law to conform to the now-rejected model of extreme deregulation that caused the crisis. The TPP would forbid countries from banning particularly risky financial products, such as the toxic derivatives that led to the $183 billion government bailout of AIG.
The TPP would threaten the use of "firewalls" - policies that are employed to stop the spread of risk between different types of financial institutions and products. While many in the United States have called for a reinstatement of the Glass-Steagall Act, that helped eliminate banking crises for four decades by prohibiting deposit-holding commercial banks from dealing in risky investments, the TPP would bar such reform. The TPP would ban capital controls, an essential policy tool to counter destabilizing flows of speculative money. Even the International Monetary Fund has recently endorsed capital controls as legitimate for mitigating or preventing financial crises.
The TPP would prohibit taxes on Wall Street speculation. That means that there would be no hope of passing proposals like the Robin Hood Tax, which would impose a tiny tax on Wall Street transactions to tamp down speculation-fueled volatility while generating hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of revenue for social, health, or environmental causes.
The TPP would empower financial firms to directly attack these government policies in foreign tribunals, and demand taxpayer compensation for policies they claim undermine their expected future profits.
The deal would require domestic law to conform to the now-rejected model of extreme deregulation that caused the crisis. The TPP would forbid countries from banning particularly risky financial products, such as the toxic derivatives that led to the $183 billion government bailout of AIG.
The TPP would threaten the use of "firewalls" - policies that are employed to stop the spread of risk between different types of financial institutions and products. While many in the United States have called for a reinstatement of the Glass-Steagall Act, that helped eliminate banking crises for four decades by prohibiting deposit-holding commercial banks from dealing in risky investments, the TPP would bar such reform. The TPP would ban capital controls, an essential policy tool to counter destabilizing flows of speculative money. Even the International Monetary Fund has recently endorsed capital controls as legitimate for mitigating or preventing financial crises.
The TPP would prohibit taxes on Wall Street speculation. That means that there would be no hope of passing proposals like the Robin Hood Tax, which would impose a tiny tax on Wall Street transactions to tamp down speculation-fueled volatility while generating hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of revenue for social, health, or environmental causes.
The TPP would empower financial firms to directly attack these government policies in foreign tribunals, and demand taxpayer compensation for policies they claim undermine their expected future profits.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
127 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You say, "They pulled it once." In reality, they never contacted Obama or anyone else at an
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2013
#84
Ok, but you also have no evidence they never contacted anyone in his administration
Amonester
Aug 2013
#85
in some dream world of your own creation perhaps,. not in this reality though.
Civilization2
Aug 2013
#103
In A Related Story The White Denied That Misogynistic Piece Of Shit Larry Summers is
BlueManFan
Aug 2013
#16
in fact they hid the first posting of the direct link to it,. claimg the use of the word
Civilization2
Aug 2013
#105
Yep. I'll give this one a minute before dancing upon any figurative bankster graves
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#28
Yep...but now I see it's from Greg Palast, whom I respect very much...this is huge...n/t
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#49
The memo, while damning, is hardly the only "evidence" of this reality.., and it seems legit.
Civilization2
Aug 2013
#106
Agreed,. denial is a powerful force, when it lets one keep faith in clearly broken systems.
Civilization2
Aug 2013
#107
We can't, and that's the hardest thing to accomplish. So many of the greatest minds throughout
Egalitarian Thug
Aug 2013
#124
Wait a second, this is from Greg Palast...oh shit, this is real...off comes the lid...
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#48
The same capitalist parasites who fucked things up so badly are now being entrusted to
HardTimes99
Aug 2013
#53
indeed,. this is a huge part of their sick game-plan, scapegoat the unions, social programs,.
Civilization2
Aug 2013
#108
You know, if Summers had been right, once, about anything, I might not be so pissed off
hatrack
Aug 2013
#64
actually he has been right every time; the 1% have won, and the rest of us have paid for it,.
Civilization2
Aug 2013
#110
Hopefully Frank is looking down on all of this and gets to do a happy dance when the bad guys lose.
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#116
Yup, they are not even done with the screwgie,. they will keep at it, till we take them down.,
Civilization2
Aug 2013
#111
"You smelly proles need to STFU. There's massive MoneyBuck profits to be made." L. Summers
Berlum
Aug 2013
#101
Exactly, this is the most important question. If we do nothing, we'll become inured to the evil. n/t
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#117
"..we are too tired to do much more than struggle to make a living."
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#120
They must be removed but fully expect protesting and civil disobedience.
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#122
Of course. Sorry, I was vague. It's not that I don't know what to do, I just don't think we have
Dark n Stormy Knight
Aug 2013
#123
Extremely creepy words from Plutonomist HW Bush regarding their then future plans:
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#119
The attitude of the rich is that money is THEIRS and the rest of us are thieves.
Spitfire of ATJ
Aug 2013
#125