General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Whistle Blower gets 35 years. When do we get to the War Criminals he exposed? [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)I pointed out that that doesn't work, see Binney and Drake.
If a Whistle Blower reveals information of wrong doing, whether s/he goes to a Reporter, see Ellsberg, or not, he should NOT be prosecuted what he reveals is true.
Ellsberg didn't spend years in jail, AND he was out on bail while his case was going forward. AND what he did compared to Manning, as Ellsberg himself has pointed out, was far more 'illegal' since he published TOP SECRET information. Manning chose not to do that, even though he could have.
If the leaks expose corruption and crimes the Whistle Blower should be treated as a WITNESS in the trials of the perps.
But that would be in a country that respects the rule of law, a country that prosecutes War Criminals, not those who expose them.
And this is not that country.