Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
15. I think you got it right.
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 02:23 AM
Aug 2013

It has 'everything to do with stigmatizing ACLU types within the Democratic Party, for whatever reason'

The reason is to smear people who criticize Obama's civil liberties record, to make it seem like the criticisms are politically motivated and being planted by known douche bags who none of us can stand.

The NSA defenders see potential for some political alliances there between the more liberty-minded people across both parties. Like with the Amash amendment to defund domestic NSA spying. It almost passed with broad support in both parties. The security establishment sees that alliance and it scares the shit out of them because it could expose their abuses and take their money. That's where part of the nonsense is coming from.

And then there are some who are just Obama loyalists, they really aren't trying to defend the NSA they just want to defend Obama. With them the reason is the same. They see the potential alliance between progressives and some conservatives on this issue and it scares the shit out of them. That's why so much of the rhetoric revolves around driving a wedge to scare progressives away from cooperating with right-wingers on this limited issue where we might agree.

Popular threads include

"The Black Helicopter Left and Its Disconnect from the Constitution"

"The Convergence of the Glenn Greenwald Left and the Alex Jones Right"

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Republicans are the re...»Reply #15