General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]billh58
(6,655 posts)out elsewhere in this thread, the people who consider themselves "victims" of the OP's decision (prank?) have avenues for redress through their owner/management chain-of-command. Businesses and private homes are not democracies.
Your statement that you would decide what was acceptable to be shown on your own business TV is exactly what is going on here and in that case you would be "deciding what content is available." If the owner of the TV has no problem with someone blocking FAUX Snooze on the company TV, then they are giving the act tacit approval as is their "right."
And yes, those who are complaining so loudly about the blocking of FAUX Snooze in a private setting ARE indeed defending that scum-bucket piece-of-shit organization and its right-wing owners and supporters. This is nothing even close to the ACLU defending the KKK and Nazis -- it is support of evil propaganda.