The New York Times has rather decisively broken with the Obama administration:

[Divernan]

64. You're so upset, you're replying to the wrong post.

Plus you're going in circles. An editorial you quote is re NSA spying & that is the same topic as the NYT publishing the Snowden files. It's all Snowden, don't you understand? The OP's perspective is that NOW the NT has decisively broken with the administration. That's the OP's point of view.
Then in your post 30, you write, "Sorry, still no case made they would no longer endorse him." That implies you believe they WOULD still endorse him. Then you jump to another point of view. In your post # 50, You posit "there have been MULTIPLE issues/editorials where they found fault w/Obama. So are you claiming the NYT had ALREADY broken w/ the Obama administration?

Whatever, let's all get back on point here. The very significant point of this thread is that this move by the New York Times does not bode well for Obama's efforts to paper over the whole matter.