The New York Times has rather decisively broken with the Obama administration:

[starroute]

79. When Wikileaks released the diplomatic cables, I checked all the papers involved

I was struck by the extent to which the Times cited just certain cables -- particularly those which involved charges against Iran -- as if they were new and exciting revelations that supported existing administration policies. You had to turn to The Guardian or Der Spiegel to learn that the great bulk of the cables were actually embarrassing to the US.

Here's the Times coverage: "Leaked Cables Offer Raw Look at U.S. Diplomacy"
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/29/world/29cables.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Here's an early Guardian story: "US embassy cables leak sparks global diplomatic crisis"
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/nov/28/us-embassy-cable-leak-diplomacy-crisis

Here's Der Spiegel: "251,000 State Department documents, many of them secret embassy reports from around the world, show how the US seeks to safeguard its influence around the world. It is nothing short of a political meltdown for US foreign policy."
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/the-us-diplomatic-leaks-a-superpower-s-view-of-the-world-a-731580.html