Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
20. I don't
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 02:04 AM
Feb 2012

The price of crude in the US will remain regulated by the world market because we have to buy on the world market and so the aggregate cost of acquisition will remain high when the world cost of petroleum is high. If we don't refine domestically we buy a large portion of our refined fuel from external sources.

The original post elided the distinction between exporting entirely domestically produced fuel and exporting domestically refined fuel.

I was just making that clear.

gasoline is processed crude oil, which the US imports almost entirely. napoleon_in_rags Feb 2012 #1
Or tell the countries to process their own damn oil New Yawker Feb 2012 #4
I wonder how much of a cash cow it is for those who do it. nt napoleon_in_rags Feb 2012 #5
just for the record bonzotex Feb 2012 #34
What? We export NO CRUDE. Lets go to the site you linked to and compare Imports vs Exports. napoleon_in_rags Feb 2012 #37
relax...just suggesting you be more precise bonzotex Feb 2012 #40
Kicking the oil speculators to the curb is what will do it. Initech Feb 2012 #2
1) Nationalize gasoline refineries NOW; or 2) The more horrible option Zalatix Feb 2012 #3
The problem with that is Hutzpa Feb 2012 #8
Last week, we imported more gasoline than we exported FarCenter Feb 2012 #6
Let me see if I understand Hutzpa Feb 2012 #7
It's a global market Oasis_ Feb 2012 #9
That's also a horrible, horrible idea Spider Jerusalem Feb 2012 #11
That's not accurate at all Oasis_ Feb 2012 #13
"significantly increased domestic production"...how? Spider Jerusalem Feb 2012 #16
it's not a difficult process Oasis_ Feb 2012 #18
This presumes that the resources are there to exploit... Spider Jerusalem Feb 2012 #19
You're questioning Oasis_ Feb 2012 #21
I'm questioning whether they'd meet the upper or lower estimates Spider Jerusalem Feb 2012 #24
I'm employed in the industry Oasis_ Feb 2012 #25
Peak oil as such isn't a lie... Spider Jerusalem Feb 2012 #27
We have already increased domestic production Viking12 Feb 2012 #39
Emptying the strategic reserves may be a good idea -- it takes attacking Iran off the table FarCenter Feb 2012 #15
Unless Iran successfully tests an atomic bomb and threatens to use it, we won't attack them anyway DFW Feb 2012 #36
The answer to that question: No, it would not. Spider Jerusalem Feb 2012 #10
No, of course not Yo_Mama Feb 2012 #12
How do you propose to do that exactly? Spider Jerusalem Feb 2012 #14
I don't Yo_Mama Feb 2012 #20
No -- Reducing bankster oil speculation would stop gas prices from spiking rocktivity Feb 2012 #17
this is true. It is that simple sometimes n/t bonzotex Feb 2012 #35
Add 117,000,000 gallons of gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel to the US market EVERY DAY... cherokeeprogressive Feb 2012 #22
How so? Oasis_ Feb 2012 #23
Crude imports are down. Refined product exports are up. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2012 #26
The answer to that is very simple: Spider Jerusalem Feb 2012 #28
Yes but we are importing less and less crude oil as time goes by. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2012 #29
No Spider Jerusalem Feb 2012 #30
Do you believe that increased cost for gasoline, diesel, and Jet A is a good thing cherokeeprogressive Feb 2012 #31
It may be a good thing insofar as it spurs efficiency... Spider Jerusalem Feb 2012 #32
So just to clarify... cherokeeprogressive Feb 2012 #33
It would probably make anything imported into the US much more expensive NickB79 Feb 2012 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would reducing US fuel ex...»Reply #20