Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
re: DU's resident "transphobes" [View all] MannyGoldstein Aug 2013 OP
The majority here seem to want to do the right thing leftstreet Aug 2013 #1
I don't know why people would object to the use of proper terms if those terms are known.... xocet Aug 2013 #8
"A few folks" think bad about straights here also. What is the real point of this discussion? nt kelliekat44 Aug 2013 #82
I find it helps to just use Manning's last name. n/t PoliticAverse Aug 2013 #2
Good post. Arctic Dave Aug 2013 #3
Here I shall reveal my own "transphobia" by saying... TreasonousBastard Aug 2013 #4
Does it matter? MannyGoldstein Aug 2013 #5
Not really. It's just that it's having a slight appearance of fad about it... TreasonousBastard Aug 2013 #6
But how could something so difficult, requiring such profound life changes, have nomorenomore08 Aug 2013 #11
Over the years I have personally known quite a few people who... TreasonousBastard Aug 2013 #16
I'm sure a whole spectrum exists, like in most other things. nomorenomore08 Aug 2013 #18
Or it could just be that people have more freedom now to exist in a way that justiceischeap Aug 2013 #67
I am not sure how gender identity or sexual orientation is a "fad". uppityperson Aug 2013 #26
wow. you really need to educate yourself on transgenders. Most of these people have been the liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #12
Educate myself? You have no idea what my past life has been and what... TreasonousBastard Aug 2013 #15
Well Chelsea asked people to start calling her Chelsea. There's no more experimenting on her end. liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #17
Now see, chervilant Aug 2013 #19
seems like that is quite a bit of intolerance hfojvt Aug 2013 #31
"Barely disguised intolerance"? Not only don't you know the first thing about me,... TreasonousBastard Aug 2013 #33
You aren't on my IL. chervilant Aug 2013 #55
This is the kind of jumping on people that is just wrong treestar Aug 2013 #24
Serious Question for you, how do you know you've never met one? uppityperson Aug 2013 #25
OK you have a point treestar Aug 2013 #28
You likely have met Transgendered people but saw them as the sex that was obvious to you. bluestate10 Aug 2013 #80
I agree there are limits. Jim Lane Aug 2013 #21
Manny, enlightenment Aug 2013 #7
+1 nomorenomore08 Aug 2013 #14
Maybe they became vehement because every other poster is yelling at them. Heywood J Aug 2013 #22
First, it is not possible to 'yell' on an internet board, it is silent. Second, being vehemently Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #60
With all due respect, I think your language here shows a flawed premise. To wit, I don't HardTimes99 Aug 2013 #78
I'm on about the same page limpyhobbler Aug 2013 #9
Making a mistake is one thing Marrah_G Aug 2013 #10
40 years ago when I grew up, bigotry on the topic was the norm bhikkhu Aug 2013 #13
I watched the film "42" last night. Interesting film. I recommend it. Zorra Aug 2013 #20
omg I watched it last night also Marrah_G Aug 2013 #23
I watched 42 last night also. wild bird Aug 2013 #27
Me, too. And the depth of hate and bigotry expressed toward him was horrifying. Zorra Aug 2013 #39
The censorship police is out in full force. Beacool Aug 2013 #29
Pronouncing the same word differently is very different from referring to a person as they wish uppityperson Aug 2013 #30
We are talking about someone who divulged his country's confidential data to a foreigner. Beacool Aug 2013 #34
How do you feel about what Daniel Ellsberg did? MannyGoldstein Aug 2013 #36
The Pentagon Papers? Beacool Aug 2013 #52
But what do you think of what Ellsberg did? MannyGoldstein Aug 2013 #56
I would have to do more research on Ellsberg. Beacool Aug 2013 #59
I don't care how you feel about Chelsea NuclearDem Aug 2013 #41
Not calling Manning a she is not an offense against the entire transgender community. Beacool Aug 2013 #48
So only 'the good ones' get respectful speech? I'm thinking of Ali again, he was an objector to the Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #54
I seem to keep repeating myself. Beacool Aug 2013 #58
I agree with the above poster's recommendation: Just use the last name. CakeGrrl Aug 2013 #62
If you don't want to be chastised for calling Chelsea "he" Laughing Mirror Aug 2013 #63
How about letting people address Manning as they choose? Beacool Aug 2013 #64
How about addressing her as she has asked to be addressed rather than browbeating her? Laughing Mirror Aug 2013 #65
How about you address any of the extremely valid points and questions? The dismissive attitude reeks Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #68
I disapprove of pretty much everything Ann Coulter says - Morning Dew Aug 2013 #72
The people who are unwilling to "indulge" (as you put it) Manning noamnety Aug 2013 #73
exactly THIS! - there is deliberate and willful intolerance here and it is hateful. bettyellen Aug 2013 #77
It's totally your right to insult Chelsea by calling her Bradley if you wish to. Zorra Aug 2013 #43
Calling someone by their legal name is an insult? Beacool Aug 2013 #51
I get it now. You don't want to address Chelsea by the name she wishes to be addressed by because Zorra Aug 2013 #76
Her actions and her name/gender are 2 seperate issues. Continuing to refer to her as "Bradley" you uppityperson Aug 2013 #81
Bea, ask your transgendered friends how they feel.... Marrah_G Aug 2013 #45
Marrah, I'm not trying to hurt anyone, specially anyone on DU who might be transgendered. Beacool Aug 2013 #50
A performer who has issues with ANY name change is pretty surprising. Performers change names often Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #57
Oh boy, that's why it's always better not to touch these kinds of threads with a ten foot pole. Beacool Aug 2013 #61
And this, my DU compatriots, is how you DON'T win hearts and minds. randome Aug 2013 #66
Honest? Utterly evasive, dismissive uncommuicative and nonresponsive. Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #69
I'm only going by the posts in this thread. randome Aug 2013 #71
I don't think there's all that much to "get." noamnety Aug 2013 #79
I have no problem with Manning's personal choices. Beacool Aug 2013 #70
I have no problem with Bradley becoming Chelsea. Ian David Aug 2013 #32
Yeah, what's up with that? Beacool Aug 2013 #35
Hey man, Affleck was da bomb in Phantoms yo!! Inkfreak Aug 2013 #44
NBC news mentioned that Manninng will not get mail unless it's addressed to Bradley KinMd Aug 2013 #37
If there are any DOD-controlled personae out there MannyGoldstein Aug 2013 #40
Great post Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #38
It's more accurate to say Chelsea was treated as Bradley MillennialDem Aug 2013 #42
What we are witnessing is a form of one upmanship Bunnahabhain Aug 2013 #46
Many are confused and harber no malice. 99Forever Aug 2013 #47
Chelsea has been Chelsea in Bradley's mind for her entire life lunatica Aug 2013 #49
People sometimes just make mistakes shenmue Aug 2013 #53
I just think we need at least fifteen more threads discussing this... Demo_Chris Aug 2013 #74
gosh Chris- is it me or do you like to put down other, less privileged peoples' concerns on a bettyellen Aug 2013 #75
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»re: DU's resident "transp...»Reply #32