Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: re: DU's resident "transphobes" [View all]Ian David
(69,059 posts)32. I have no problem with Bradley becoming Chelsea.
I'm much more troubled by Ben Affleck becoming Batman.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't know why people would object to the use of proper terms if those terms are known....
xocet
Aug 2013
#8
"A few folks" think bad about straights here also. What is the real point of this discussion? nt
kelliekat44
Aug 2013
#82
Not really. It's just that it's having a slight appearance of fad about it...
TreasonousBastard
Aug 2013
#6
But how could something so difficult, requiring such profound life changes, have
nomorenomore08
Aug 2013
#11
Or it could just be that people have more freedom now to exist in a way that
justiceischeap
Aug 2013
#67
wow. you really need to educate yourself on transgenders. Most of these people have been the
liberal_at_heart
Aug 2013
#12
Educate myself? You have no idea what my past life has been and what...
TreasonousBastard
Aug 2013
#15
Well Chelsea asked people to start calling her Chelsea. There's no more experimenting on her end.
liberal_at_heart
Aug 2013
#17
"Barely disguised intolerance"? Not only don't you know the first thing about me,...
TreasonousBastard
Aug 2013
#33
You likely have met Transgendered people but saw them as the sex that was obvious to you.
bluestate10
Aug 2013
#80
First, it is not possible to 'yell' on an internet board, it is silent. Second, being vehemently
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#60
With all due respect, I think your language here shows a flawed premise. To wit, I don't
HardTimes99
Aug 2013
#78
Pronouncing the same word differently is very different from referring to a person as they wish
uppityperson
Aug 2013
#30
We are talking about someone who divulged his country's confidential data to a foreigner.
Beacool
Aug 2013
#34
Not calling Manning a she is not an offense against the entire transgender community.
Beacool
Aug 2013
#48
So only 'the good ones' get respectful speech? I'm thinking of Ali again, he was an objector to the
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#54
How about addressing her as she has asked to be addressed rather than browbeating her?
Laughing Mirror
Aug 2013
#65
How about you address any of the extremely valid points and questions? The dismissive attitude reeks
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#68
exactly THIS! - there is deliberate and willful intolerance here and it is hateful.
bettyellen
Aug 2013
#77
I get it now. You don't want to address Chelsea by the name she wishes to be addressed by because
Zorra
Aug 2013
#76
Her actions and her name/gender are 2 seperate issues. Continuing to refer to her as "Bradley" you
uppityperson
Aug 2013
#81
Marrah, I'm not trying to hurt anyone, specially anyone on DU who might be transgendered.
Beacool
Aug 2013
#50
A performer who has issues with ANY name change is pretty surprising. Performers change names often
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#57
Oh boy, that's why it's always better not to touch these kinds of threads with a ten foot pole.
Beacool
Aug 2013
#61
NBC news mentioned that Manninng will not get mail unless it's addressed to Bradley
KinMd
Aug 2013
#37
gosh Chris- is it me or do you like to put down other, less privileged peoples' concerns on a
bettyellen
Aug 2013
#75