Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What the hell? wild bird Aug 2013 #1
one assumes that there are protocols for something like this cali Aug 2013 #2
You would hope so, wild bird Aug 2013 #3
at least a transfer Enrique Aug 2013 #7
wtf? if an investigation finds he operates that site, fire him cali Aug 2013 #9
What would be a good match? RZM Aug 2013 #10
The NRA! IronLionZion Aug 2013 #12
At least that's the private sector RZM Aug 2013 #14
yep, even if true, there are serious freedom of speech issues here Supersedeas Aug 2013 #17
wow...I don't agree with the WAY Snowden started the review of what our agencies does and I don't uponit7771 Aug 2013 #4
I'm not clear on what this has to do with Snowden. At all. cali Aug 2013 #5
Wrong thread perhaps? kiva Aug 2013 #6
Your auto-post program is broken. Turn off and restart it.. should fix it up. n/t 1awake Aug 2013 #16
exactly! If Snowden hadn't done that - there would be no wmd attacks in Syria and Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #46
This guy sounds totally unstable LittleBlue Aug 2013 #8
agreed Liberal_in_LA Aug 2013 #35
Well that sounds Aerows Aug 2013 #11
DHS has a pretty stringent background investigation, on par with defense/intel IronLionZion Aug 2013 #13
thanks for the info cali Aug 2013 #15
The guy is a purchasing agent madville Aug 2013 #18
weapons r us Supersedeas Aug 2013 #19
If you have heard this from caucasians all your lives.... mstinamotorcity2 Aug 2013 #20
not sure if your trying to justify this lunatic, seems the same as justifying the other side of loli phabay Aug 2013 #21
Nope not trying to justify. mstinamotorcity2 Aug 2013 #23
still seems that you are using what has happened before to justify this guy loli phabay Aug 2013 #26
The truth... Lancero Aug 2013 #41
Of course it is. And it's no more justifiable when white people do it. nomorenomore08 Aug 2013 #47
What comes around, goes around? Supersedeas Aug 2013 #22
Understanding History doesn't make mstinamotorcity2 Aug 2013 #25
problem is this kind of hate is against whole groups rather than the offending individual loli phabay Aug 2013 #27
True, it is only a matter of time Supersedeas Aug 2013 #29
oh bullshit. cali Aug 2013 #33
most people sure as fuck don't believe in killing lots of members of another race. cali Aug 2013 #24
seldom do i agree with you, but you nailed it loli phabay Aug 2013 #28
To get angry with me mstinamotorcity2 Aug 2013 #30
I'm not angry with you. I'm angry with the kind of mentality you exhibit cali Aug 2013 #32
don't insult his version of history Supersedeas Aug 2013 #38
I never said most people. mstinamotorcity2 Aug 2013 #44
those questions are imbedded in the previous post Supersedeas Aug 2013 #31
well that was about as clear as a bowl of oatmeal. cali Aug 2013 #34
sure, thanks Supersedeas Aug 2013 #36
what on earth are you trying to say, dear? cali Aug 2013 #37
He's now been put on paid leave. B2G Aug 2013 #39
history we can believe in Supersedeas Aug 2013 #42
This guy has as much credibility of starting a race war as Cartman does. Initech Aug 2013 #40
maybe that's where onethatcares Aug 2013 #43
Right before he starts killing people just have him tell others he was bored The Straight Story Aug 2013 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DHS Employee Promotes Rac...»Reply #23