Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ''Is it just me, or is secret blanket surveillance obscenely outrageous?'' [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)17. Your sources, please?

Lawmakers Who Upheld NSA Phone Spying Received Double the Defense Industry Cash
BY DAVID KRAVETS
Wired.com, 07.26.13
The numbers tell the story in votes and dollars. On Wednesday, the House voted 217 to 205 not to rein in the NSAs phone-spying dragnet. It turns out that those 217 no voters received twice as much campaign financing from the defense and intelligence industry as the 205 yes voters.
Thats the upshot of a new analysis by MapLight, a Berkeley-based non-profit that performed the inquiry at WIREDs request. The investigation shows that defense cash was a better predictor of a members vote on the Amash amendment than party affiliation. House members who voted to continue the massive phone-call-metadata spy program, on average, raked in 122 percent more money from defense contractors than those who voted to dismantle it.
Overall, political action committees and employees from defense and intelligence firms such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing, United Technologies, Honeywell International, and others ponied up $12.97 million in donations for a two-year period ending December 31, 2012, according to the analysis, which MapLight performed with financing data from OpenSecrets. Lawmakers who voted to continue the NSA dragnet-surveillance program averaged $41,635 from the pot, whereas House members who voted to repeal authority averaged $18,765.
Of the top 10 money getters, only one House member Rep. Jim Moran (D-Virginia) voted to end the program.
CONTINUED...
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/07/money-nsa-vote/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
''Is it just me, or is secret blanket surveillance obscenely outrageous?'' [View all]
Octafish
Aug 2013
OP
If Rehnquist and Scalia hadn't fixed the Florida problem there wouldn't have been any war on terra.
Octafish
Aug 2013
#4
Yep. They literally changed the course of history, and got away with it. Just like they did with
silvershadow
Aug 2013
#21
And former President Carter: "America has no functioning democracy."
woo me with science
Aug 2013
#36
Couldn't be more like 1984 if they appointed Gen Clapper to investigate himself.
Octafish
Aug 2013
#24
What's outrageous is a government that demands full disclosure from it's citizens,...
Spitfire of ATJ
Aug 2013
#27
Any politician that doesn't see that is too isolated in the DC bubble....
Spitfire of ATJ
Aug 2013
#31
He might not "have invented the internet," but he certainly understands it well enough! :)
Pholus
Aug 2013
#29
Al Gore Tears Into NSA Defenders: 'We Don’t Do Dial Groups On The Bill Of Rights'
Octafish
Aug 2013
#35
****DEAR MR GORE, The blanket surveillance by the gov isn't all secret and never has been****
uponit7771
Aug 2013
#40
Nothing like spewing more libertarian sophistry surveillance doesnt mean spying..two difference word
uponit7771
Aug 2013
#45
NOT a minor talking point a HUGE difference...surveillance is not spying. Boston would
uponit7771
Aug 2013
#49
cultists only like him when they can blame Nader: what Gore actually does and says is beyond them
MisterP
Aug 2013
#41
In part I blame the sheep who were/are willing to stand in airport lines while getting free feel-ups
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2013
#55