Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Did I just stop by DU and find people PUSHING for war against Syria? [View all]Rex
(65,616 posts)130. Well they are WRONG. Human nature wants to help
out when children are gassed.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
194 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Did I just stop by DU and find people PUSHING for war against Syria? [View all]
Ken Burch
Aug 2013
OP
Some people are obsessed with trying to prove, despite the overwhelming evidence,
Ken Burch
Aug 2013
#3
Do you legitimately not see the differences, or are you like... drunk? high?
DireStrike
Aug 2013
#34
I'm not the one pretending there's some constant template for US military actions
Recursion
Aug 2013
#37
Can you give an example of a US military action/war, other than the balkans, which was not for these
DireStrike
Aug 2013
#72
Actually we were in both countries at least twice. Neither time benefited either country.
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#79
I was going to respond here - but decided it deserved its own thread.
HumansAndResources
Aug 2013
#163
How is questioning the usefulness of U.S. military intervention "paternalist"?
Ken Burch
Aug 2013
#25
Gaddafi was already doomed to go out of power by the time "the West" stepped in.
Ken Burch
Aug 2013
#18
Libya is a mess right now. Not for the 'western business' Corps and its puppet government
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#111
"Funny that we don't 'support the rebels, who are actually REAL rebels in Bahrain, or in Uzbekistan"
EX500rider
Aug 2013
#118
I believe people like Hillary who told us we used a 'proxie army' in Libya and 'that is how we
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#129
While it was not immediately successful in Burma it did lead to a sustained effort to create
grantcart
Aug 2013
#135
I don't have time to follow the details but all of the remarks, sans yours, have missed
grantcart
Aug 2013
#187
but this will be the war to end all wars and to keep the world safe for democracy
Douglas Carpenter
Aug 2013
#2
And the League of Nations and the Treaty of Versailles will take care of everything else
Ken Burch
Aug 2013
#8
..but if there really was a madman committing genocide, don't we have a moral obligation to stop it?
SylviaD
Aug 2013
#153
So, you want the UN to just ignore this and let Syria keep gassing little kids, then?
MADem
Aug 2013
#78
Pssst.....I've got some shocking news for you...we DO this already!!! We've done it for decades!
MADem
Aug 2013
#106
Colin Powell held up a vial of anthrax at the United Nations, and the rest is history.
another_liberal
Aug 2013
#126
Even though "we" would NOT be thick "on the ground" doing a CW destruction protocol
MADem
Aug 2013
#186
If the UN does nothing, yes. It is not our responsibility to clean up every genocidal mess
bluestate10
Aug 2013
#150
Do you hear me talking about acting outside a UN imprimatur? No? Well, then why go off on me
MADem
Aug 2013
#168
al Assad is no Saddam. Saddam's population was pacified and cowed, even those who opposed him.
MADem
Aug 2013
#175
In the absence of proof of who did it, and since it was obviously not in the interest of Assad to do
leveymg
Aug 2013
#47
I don't mean to be rude, but isn't the purpose of a UN investigation to determine "who did it?"
MADem
Aug 2013
#49
My point stands - when the most likely culprit is not the regime, why does the US talk about missile
leveymg
Aug 2013
#50
You do realize that war planning is what they do at the Pentagon, each and every day?
MADem
Aug 2013
#67
There is heavy bias and no balance being expressed-no mention of the possibility that the opposition
leveymg
Aug 2013
#68
Nobody is going to be able to figure out who pulled the trigger on this one. Here's why:
leveymg
Aug 2013
#77
No offense, but you are assuming that the intel has to be "real time" and it doesn't.
MADem
Aug 2013
#81
If we have such a capability (and probably do) it's near real-time. So, if there were an order
leveymg
Aug 2013
#85
Not always--that would only be the case if we had an asset close to the throne, and
MADem
Aug 2013
#88
You seem to assume that we can't decrypt older Russian communications equipment.
leveymg
Aug 2013
#90
The worst thing we can do is to punish the wrong side and reward the perpetrators.
leveymg
Aug 2013
#101
Who is suggesting that we do that, though? There IS a UN team IN SYRIA, right NOW.
MADem
Aug 2013
#103
The UN bought Powell's 'WMD on every corner' speech. Shock and Awe was sold as 'precision bombing'
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#57
Well, that will set the bar that much higher. It won't be us going in there and pleading for a
MADem
Aug 2013
#69
Fox news? Come off it--they won't report, becaue they are constrained from making a determination.
MADem
Aug 2013
#169
One more time--the report will contain within it evidence of where the attack originated,
MADem
Aug 2013
#173
You've got to be kidding me. Way to show us what you don't know and don't understand!
MADem
Aug 2013
#66
You're a real kick. It might've worked if you didn't get over dramatic in paragraph 3
DisgustipatedinCA
Aug 2013
#107
I hate false constructs. This whole "Waaah waaah waah Syria WAR" bullshit is just trolling, IMO.
MADem
Aug 2013
#94
If you want to talk about that, start a thread on it. Thi thread is about emergent issues in Syria
MADem
Aug 2013
#124
It's related because the OP is about US Mideast Policy, not your narrow view of it
Ocelot
Aug 2013
#128
I'm not giving orders, but what I am doing is giving the remarks issuing from you the weight they
MADem
Aug 2013
#179
Well, if that's the way you want to define YOURSELF, I am certainly not going to disabuse you of
MADem
Aug 2013
#182
Leave Syria to it's own devices. Is it important to maintain a presence to tap into the mid-east
geckosfeet
Aug 2013
#38
It was the lesser of two evils unless you think we could have have/should have joined the AXIS./nt
DemocratSinceBirth
Aug 2013
#73
I'm not advocating attacking anybody unless attacking them can prove efficacious.
DemocratSinceBirth
Aug 2013
#120
The problem is that Hitler analogy applies much more to the sectarian insurgents than to Syria.
David__77
Aug 2013
#140
None of the allies in World War 2 were in the war to stop a genocide. n/t
DisgustipatedinCA
Aug 2013
#193
There's money to be made in war. Those military contractor dollars can't just spend themselves...
MotherPetrie
Aug 2013
#58
Even though Colin Powell hasn't yet made his appearance with irrefutable evidence yet.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Aug 2013
#62
After the response by the 'pro-spying', NSA supporters...nothing surprises me around DU anymore.
Purveyor
Aug 2013
#65
Be careful. It isn't the pro spying people calling for intervention in Syria.
bluestate10
Aug 2013
#155
Syria are Iran's #1 ally. America is Israel's #1 ally. Israel desperately wants war with Iran.
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#102
The same people will be railing about extra-judicial executions when the USA has to use
bluestate10
Aug 2013
#143