Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Did I just stop by DU and find people PUSHING for war against Syria? [View all]allinthegame
(132 posts)148. Who made us the boss of everyone?
We have no right to interfer in domestic troubles as Syria and Egypt are currently having.
Iraq is torn asunder now that we departed and the same will happen in Afghanistan.
Where does it say we should,take our money and lives and squander them oversea when we need to improve education and infrastructure and make sure Health care works.
If these countries want to gas themselves and blow each other up, so be it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
194 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Did I just stop by DU and find people PUSHING for war against Syria? [View all]
Ken Burch
Aug 2013
OP
Some people are obsessed with trying to prove, despite the overwhelming evidence,
Ken Burch
Aug 2013
#3
Do you legitimately not see the differences, or are you like... drunk? high?
DireStrike
Aug 2013
#34
I'm not the one pretending there's some constant template for US military actions
Recursion
Aug 2013
#37
Can you give an example of a US military action/war, other than the balkans, which was not for these
DireStrike
Aug 2013
#72
Actually we were in both countries at least twice. Neither time benefited either country.
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#79
I was going to respond here - but decided it deserved its own thread.
HumansAndResources
Aug 2013
#163
How is questioning the usefulness of U.S. military intervention "paternalist"?
Ken Burch
Aug 2013
#25
Gaddafi was already doomed to go out of power by the time "the West" stepped in.
Ken Burch
Aug 2013
#18
Libya is a mess right now. Not for the 'western business' Corps and its puppet government
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#111
"Funny that we don't 'support the rebels, who are actually REAL rebels in Bahrain, or in Uzbekistan"
EX500rider
Aug 2013
#118
I believe people like Hillary who told us we used a 'proxie army' in Libya and 'that is how we
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#129
While it was not immediately successful in Burma it did lead to a sustained effort to create
grantcart
Aug 2013
#135
I don't have time to follow the details but all of the remarks, sans yours, have missed
grantcart
Aug 2013
#187
but this will be the war to end all wars and to keep the world safe for democracy
Douglas Carpenter
Aug 2013
#2
And the League of Nations and the Treaty of Versailles will take care of everything else
Ken Burch
Aug 2013
#8
..but if there really was a madman committing genocide, don't we have a moral obligation to stop it?
SylviaD
Aug 2013
#153
So, you want the UN to just ignore this and let Syria keep gassing little kids, then?
MADem
Aug 2013
#78
Pssst.....I've got some shocking news for you...we DO this already!!! We've done it for decades!
MADem
Aug 2013
#106
Colin Powell held up a vial of anthrax at the United Nations, and the rest is history.
another_liberal
Aug 2013
#126
Even though "we" would NOT be thick "on the ground" doing a CW destruction protocol
MADem
Aug 2013
#186
If the UN does nothing, yes. It is not our responsibility to clean up every genocidal mess
bluestate10
Aug 2013
#150
Do you hear me talking about acting outside a UN imprimatur? No? Well, then why go off on me
MADem
Aug 2013
#168
al Assad is no Saddam. Saddam's population was pacified and cowed, even those who opposed him.
MADem
Aug 2013
#175
In the absence of proof of who did it, and since it was obviously not in the interest of Assad to do
leveymg
Aug 2013
#47
I don't mean to be rude, but isn't the purpose of a UN investigation to determine "who did it?"
MADem
Aug 2013
#49
My point stands - when the most likely culprit is not the regime, why does the US talk about missile
leveymg
Aug 2013
#50
You do realize that war planning is what they do at the Pentagon, each and every day?
MADem
Aug 2013
#67
There is heavy bias and no balance being expressed-no mention of the possibility that the opposition
leveymg
Aug 2013
#68
Nobody is going to be able to figure out who pulled the trigger on this one. Here's why:
leveymg
Aug 2013
#77
No offense, but you are assuming that the intel has to be "real time" and it doesn't.
MADem
Aug 2013
#81
If we have such a capability (and probably do) it's near real-time. So, if there were an order
leveymg
Aug 2013
#85
Not always--that would only be the case if we had an asset close to the throne, and
MADem
Aug 2013
#88
You seem to assume that we can't decrypt older Russian communications equipment.
leveymg
Aug 2013
#90
The worst thing we can do is to punish the wrong side and reward the perpetrators.
leveymg
Aug 2013
#101
Who is suggesting that we do that, though? There IS a UN team IN SYRIA, right NOW.
MADem
Aug 2013
#103
The UN bought Powell's 'WMD on every corner' speech. Shock and Awe was sold as 'precision bombing'
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#57
Well, that will set the bar that much higher. It won't be us going in there and pleading for a
MADem
Aug 2013
#69
Fox news? Come off it--they won't report, becaue they are constrained from making a determination.
MADem
Aug 2013
#169
One more time--the report will contain within it evidence of where the attack originated,
MADem
Aug 2013
#173
You've got to be kidding me. Way to show us what you don't know and don't understand!
MADem
Aug 2013
#66
You're a real kick. It might've worked if you didn't get over dramatic in paragraph 3
DisgustipatedinCA
Aug 2013
#107
I hate false constructs. This whole "Waaah waaah waah Syria WAR" bullshit is just trolling, IMO.
MADem
Aug 2013
#94
If you want to talk about that, start a thread on it. Thi thread is about emergent issues in Syria
MADem
Aug 2013
#124
It's related because the OP is about US Mideast Policy, not your narrow view of it
Ocelot
Aug 2013
#128
I'm not giving orders, but what I am doing is giving the remarks issuing from you the weight they
MADem
Aug 2013
#179
Well, if that's the way you want to define YOURSELF, I am certainly not going to disabuse you of
MADem
Aug 2013
#182
Leave Syria to it's own devices. Is it important to maintain a presence to tap into the mid-east
geckosfeet
Aug 2013
#38
It was the lesser of two evils unless you think we could have have/should have joined the AXIS./nt
DemocratSinceBirth
Aug 2013
#73
I'm not advocating attacking anybody unless attacking them can prove efficacious.
DemocratSinceBirth
Aug 2013
#120
The problem is that Hitler analogy applies much more to the sectarian insurgents than to Syria.
David__77
Aug 2013
#140
None of the allies in World War 2 were in the war to stop a genocide. n/t
DisgustipatedinCA
Aug 2013
#193
There's money to be made in war. Those military contractor dollars can't just spend themselves...
MotherPetrie
Aug 2013
#58
Even though Colin Powell hasn't yet made his appearance with irrefutable evidence yet.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Aug 2013
#62
After the response by the 'pro-spying', NSA supporters...nothing surprises me around DU anymore.
Purveyor
Aug 2013
#65
Be careful. It isn't the pro spying people calling for intervention in Syria.
bluestate10
Aug 2013
#155
Syria are Iran's #1 ally. America is Israel's #1 ally. Israel desperately wants war with Iran.
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#102
The same people will be railing about extra-judicial executions when the USA has to use
bluestate10
Aug 2013
#143