Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Remember the British Intelligence/Yellow Cake controversy? [View all]
"Sixteen Words" controversy in 2003 State of the Union
In his January 2003 State of the Union speech, U.S. President George W. Bush said, "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."[2] This single sentence is now known as "the Sixteen Words."[3] The administration later conceded that evidence in support of the claim was inconclusive and stated, "These sixteen words should never have been included." The administration attributed the error to the CIA.[4] In mid-2003, the U.S. government declassified the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate, which contained a dissenting opinion published by the U.S. Department of State stating that the intelligence connecting Niger to Saddam Hussein was "highly suspect," primarily because State Department's intelligence agency analysts did not believe that Niger would be likely to engage in such a transaction due to a French consortium which maintained close control over the Nigerien uranium industry.[5]
According to The Washington Post, when occupying troops found no evidence of a current nuclear program, the statement and how it came to be in the speech became a focus for critics in Washington and foreign capitals to press the case that the White House manipulated facts to take the United States to war. The Post reported, "Dozens of interviews with current and former intelligence officials and policymakers in the United States, Britain, France and Italy show that the Bush administration disregarded key information available at the time showing that the Iraq-Niger claim was highly questionable." [6] With the release of the 2002 NIE report, the Bush administration was criticized for including the statement in the State of the Union despite CIA and State Department reports questioning its veracity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niger_uranium_forgeries
In his January 2003 State of the Union speech, U.S. President George W. Bush said, "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."[2] This single sentence is now known as "the Sixteen Words."[3] The administration later conceded that evidence in support of the claim was inconclusive and stated, "These sixteen words should never have been included." The administration attributed the error to the CIA.[4] In mid-2003, the U.S. government declassified the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate, which contained a dissenting opinion published by the U.S. Department of State stating that the intelligence connecting Niger to Saddam Hussein was "highly suspect," primarily because State Department's intelligence agency analysts did not believe that Niger would be likely to engage in such a transaction due to a French consortium which maintained close control over the Nigerien uranium industry.[5]
According to The Washington Post, when occupying troops found no evidence of a current nuclear program, the statement and how it came to be in the speech became a focus for critics in Washington and foreign capitals to press the case that the White House manipulated facts to take the United States to war. The Post reported, "Dozens of interviews with current and former intelligence officials and policymakers in the United States, Britain, France and Italy show that the Bush administration disregarded key information available at the time showing that the Iraq-Niger claim was highly questionable." [6] With the release of the 2002 NIE report, the Bush administration was criticized for including the statement in the State of the Union despite CIA and State Department reports questioning its veracity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niger_uranium_forgeries
Well....
....
President Barack Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron are both gravely concerned by the attack that took place in Damascus on Wednesday and the increasing signs that this was a significant chemical weapons attack carried out by the Syrian regime against its own people," spokesperson for Cameron said Saturday.
"They reiterated that significant use of chemical weapons would merit a serious response from the international community and both have tasked officials to examine all the options," the spokesperson said.
A senior Obama administration official told The Associated Press Sunday there is "very little doubt" that a chemical weapon was involved.
British newspaper, the Sunday Telegraph, said Cameron plans to put forward a game-changing resolution to the United National Security Council that would give the Syrian government an ultimatum to disarm.
....
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/08/25/20179917-us-action-would-inflame-the-middle-east-syria-warns-as-white-house-weighs-options?lite
President Barack Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron are both gravely concerned by the attack that took place in Damascus on Wednesday and the increasing signs that this was a significant chemical weapons attack carried out by the Syrian regime against its own people," spokesperson for Cameron said Saturday.
"They reiterated that significant use of chemical weapons would merit a serious response from the international community and both have tasked officials to examine all the options," the spokesperson said.
A senior Obama administration official told The Associated Press Sunday there is "very little doubt" that a chemical weapon was involved.
British newspaper, the Sunday Telegraph, said Cameron plans to put forward a game-changing resolution to the United National Security Council that would give the Syrian government an ultimatum to disarm.
....
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/08/25/20179917-us-action-would-inflame-the-middle-east-syria-warns-as-white-house-weighs-options?lite
When in doubt, quote the Brits...
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is it just me, or is this place very quiet this morning? Like we're in mourning.
leveymg
Aug 2013
#1
It has a "Guns of August" feel about it - a lot of unintended consequences and a wider, longer,
leveymg
Aug 2013
#13
doubt it--the "at least he's put no boots on the ground" crowd will just change the mantra to
MisterP
Aug 2013
#35
We don't put our 'boots on the ground' if possible. We use proxy armies, our dictator
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#38
That's just it. The US is still uncertain who did it. The Brits, however, are sure it was Assad.
Junkdrawer
Aug 2013
#7
Let's just say that Larry Wilkerson has accused Israel of such false flag operations in Syria....
Junkdrawer
Aug 2013
#9
Wilkerson doesn't stike me as a "blame the Jews for all the ills of the world" type...
Junkdrawer
Aug 2013
#29
I don't think there are too many who are still doubting that people were killed by some sort of gas.
leveymg
Aug 2013
#20
There was a chemical attack, the only question is by whom. All sides agree there was an attack
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#21