Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SunsetDreams

(8,571 posts)
140. Obama did not appoint Donohoe, your OP is wrong
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 12:19 PM
Feb 2012
The Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service is an eleven-member board comparable to a board of directors of a private corporation, except in service of the American postal system. Nine members are appointed by the President of the United States, subject to confirmation by the Senate. The nine presidentially appointed Governors choose the Postmaster General, who also serves as a member of the Board. These 10, in turn, choose a Deputy Postmaster General, who becomes the 11th member of the Board. The Postmaster General and Deputy Postmaster General serve at the pleasure of the Governors.

Each Governor is appointed to a nine-year term or to the remainder of an unexpired term created by the death or resignation of a sitting Governor. Terms of the Governors are staggered to expire each year on December 8. A Governor whose term has expired may continue to sit on the Board for up to one year until a successor has been appointed. No more than five of the nine Governors may be of the same political party. On December 20, 2006, President George W. Bush signed the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act, P.L. 109-435, which changed the terms of subsequently appointed Governors from nine to seven years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Board_of_Governors_of_the_United_States_Postal_Service


In 1970, when the Board was established by the Postal Reorganization Act, the governors of the Postal Service were appointed for terms of nine years. The first nine appointments were for staggered terms of one to nine years. Subsequent appointments were made for the full nine years. On December 20, 2006, President George W. Bush signed the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act, P.L. 109-435, which changed the terms of subsequently appointed governors from nine to seven years. The Act also added some professional qualifications for the governors. The governors are chosen to represent the public interest generally and cannot be representatives of special interests. Not more than five of the nine may belong to the same political party. They shall be chosen solely on the basis of their experience in the field of public service, law or accounting or on their demonstrated ability in managing organizations or corporations (in either the public or private sector) of substantial size, except that at least four of the governors shall be chosen solely on the basis of their demonstrated ability in managing organizations or corporations (in either the public or private sector) that employ at least 50,000 employees.

Appointments are made when vacancies occur or for the remainder of unexpired terms. Each governor’s term expires on December 8 of a given year. Governors may continue to serve following expiration of their term or until a successor is appointed but not for more than one year. No person may serve more than two terms as a governor.

The Board directs the exercise of the powers of the Postal Service, directs and controls its expenditures, reviews its practices, conducts long-range planning and sets policies on all postal matters. The Board takes up matters such as service standards, capital investments and facilities projects exceeding $25 million. It also approves officer compensation.


http://about.usps.com/who-we-are/leadership/board-governors.htm

Now for the really eye-opening part: Which President appointed most of the Governors?

Thurgood Marshall Jr. Chairman appointed by George W. Bush
Mickey D. Barnett, Vice-Chairman, appointed by George W. Bush
Louis J. Giuliano, Member, appointed by George W. Bush
James H. Bilbray, Member, appointed by George W. Bush
Ellen C. Williams, Member, appointed by George W. Bush
Dennis J. Toner, Member, appointed by Barack Obama
Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General and CEO, appointed by Board Of Governors
Ronald A. Stroman, Deputy Postmaster General, appointed by Board Of Governors

James C. Miller III, Member, appointed by George W. Bush
Note: I'm not sure if James C. Miller III is still on the Board of Governors, Wiki list him, but USPS site
Members of the Board of Governors does not.

More on Patrick R. Donahoe here

Is there something wrong with that picture? Patrick R. Donahoe, was appointed by the Board of Governors whom all except one were GWB appointees?? YIKES!!! I'm seeing an ugly picture here which may be the bigger picture of what is currently happening with USPS.

http://www.thenation.com/blog/166103/post-office-not-broke
At the behest of the Republican-controlled Congress of the Bush-Cheney era, the USPS has been forced since 2006 to pre-fund future retiree health benefits. As the American Postal Workers Union notes, “This mandate is the primary cause of the agency’s financial crisis. No other government agency or private company bears this burden, which costs the USPS approximately $5.5 billion annually.”

Now, however, we learn that the pre-funding requirements have taken so much money from the USPS that—according to the postal service’s own inspector general—it has “significantly exceeded” the level of reserved money that the federal government or private corporations divert to meet future pension and retiree healthcare demands. “Using ratepayer funds, it has built a war chest of over $326 billion to address its future liabilities,” acknowledges Postal Service Inspector General David C. Williams.


USPS Area Mail Processing study decision 2/23/12
In a move to help ensure the future of the nation’s mail system, while adapting to America’s changing mailing trends, the U.S. Postal Service today announced that the Area Mail Processing consolidation studies that began more than five months ago have been completed.

These changes are a necessary part of a larger comprehensive plan developed by the Postal Service to reduce operating costs by $20 billion by 2015 and return the organization to profitability.

The Postal Service is in the midst of a financial crisis due to the combined effects of the economic recession, increased use of electronic communications, and an obligation to prefund retiree health benefits. First-Class Mail volume has deteriorated, leading to significant revenue declines, and the obligation to prefund these retiree health benefits on an accelerated basis remains unresolved. To date, legislative proposals to address the financial crisis remain pending, leaving the Postal Service and the mailing industry it supports in an increasingly precarious position.

Since 2006, First-Class Mail volume has rapidly declined, leaving a mail mix that generates far less revenue than it costs to sustain postal operations. The dramatic decline in mail volume has resulted in an enormous amount of excess capacity within the network, creating significant opportunity for consolidation.


Previous USPS announcement on July 26, 2011 regarding Expanded Access Study
WASHINGTON — As more customers choose to conduct their postal business online, on their smart phones and at their favorite shopping destinations, the need for the U.S. Postal Service to maintain its nearly 32,000 retail offices — the largest retail network in the country — diminishes. To that end, the U.S. Postal Service announced today that it will be taking the next step in right-sizing its expansive retail network by conducting studies of approximately 3,700 retail offices to determine customer needs. As part of this effort, the Postal Service also introduced a retail-replacement option for affected communities around the nation.

“Today, more than 35 percent of the Postal Service’s retail revenue comes from expanded access locations such as grocery stores, drug stores, office supply stores, retail chains, self-service kiosks, ATMs and usps.com, open 24/7,” said Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe. “Our customer’s habits have made it clear that they no longer require a physical post office to conduct most of their postal business.”

For communities currently without a postal retail office and for communities affected by these retail optimization efforts, the Postal Service introduced the Village Post Office as a potential replacement option. Village Post Offices would be operated by local businesses, such as pharmacies, grocery stores and other appropriate retailers, and would offer popular postal products and services such as stamps and flat-rate packaging.

“By working with third-party retailers, we’re creating easier, more convenient access to our products and services when and where our customers want them,” Donahoe said. “The Village Post Office will offer another way for us to meet our customers’ needs.”


Here: http://about.usps.com/news/national-releases/2011/pr11_089.htm

On Edit: Thank you ProSense for your further research on this matter. I'm going to include this information here, because there seems to be a misconception that President Obama can just fire Patrick Donahoe if he wanted to.

House Dem calls for firing postmaster general; blames Obama, GOP Congress
Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) on Monday afternoon called on the the Obama administration to fire Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe in light of Donahoe's announced plan for drastic service reductions at the U.S. Postal Service (USPS).


Just one problem with that The President Cannot Fire The Postmaster General
In 1971, the Post Office Department was re-organized into the United States Postal Service, a special agency independent of the executive branch. Thus, the Postmaster General is no longer a member of the Cabinet and is no longer in Presidential succession.


Furthermore:
The Postal Reorganization Act of 1970 abolished the United States Post Office Department, a part of the cabinet, and created the United States Postal Service, a corporation-like independent agency with an official monopoly on the delivery of mail in the United States. Pub.L. 91-375 was signed by President Richard Nixon on August 12, 1970.

The legislation was a direct outcome of the U.S. postal strike of 1970.

The first paragraph of the Act reads:

“The United States Postal Service shall be operated as a basic and fundamental service provided to the people by the Government of the United States, authorized by the Constitution, created by Act of Congress, and supported by the people. The Postal Service shall have as its basic function the obligation to provide postal services to bind the Nation together through the personal, educational, literary, and business correspondence of the people. It shall provide prompt, reliable, and efficient services to patrons in all areas and shall render postal services to all communities. The costs of establishing and maintaining the Postal Service shall not be apportioned to impair the overall value of such service to the people.


WOW check this out, thanks to suffragette.
Shock Doctrine at U.S. Postal Service: Is a Manufactured Crisis Behind Push Toward Privatization?
But many postal workers say the much-touted crisis facing the U.S. Postal Service is not what it seems. They argue the greatest volume of mail handled in the 236-year history of the postal service was 2006. They also point to a 2006 law that forced the USPS to become the only agency required to fund 75 years of retiree health benefits over just a 10-year span, and say the law’s requirements account for 100 percent of the service’s $20 billion in losses over the previous four years, without which the service would have turned a profit. Last week, Republicans introduced legislation to overhaul the USPS in response to a bill proposed by Democrats that would refund a reported $6.9 billion in over-payments to the USPS retirement plan, offer early retirement and voluntary separation incentives, adjust retiree benefits prepayment requirements, and preserve employee protections set out in collective bargaining agreements.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Once again the Republican's have gotten to this Administration! n/t teddy51 Feb 2012 #1
Once again it isnt R-cons vs. Democrats. It's the oligarchs vs. ThePeople. rhett o rick Feb 2012 #7
Agreed, and I don't see that changing anytime soon. n/t teddy51 Feb 2012 #8
It will not change until we change the system. stillwaiting Feb 2012 #57
"Harm reduction is my current goal" TBF Feb 2012 #116
Thanks for being awake. midnight Feb 2012 #52
Now we must get busy awakening a few million Americans. nm rhett o rick Feb 2012 #81
Only if you think waking up the bourgeoise is at all helpful ... TBF Feb 2012 #117
Who do you include in your definition of bourgeoise? I still think the working class needs a wakeup rhett o rick Feb 2012 #118
That's not the kind of wake-up call I was referring to. nt TBF Feb 2012 #120
Sorry, I am totally lost. And yes I am sober. At least for the next half hour. nm rhett o rick Feb 2012 #130
When you talked about oligarchs v. people you were definitely on the right track - TBF Feb 2012 #135
Thank you for the clarification. Withholding our labor isnt an option at this rhett o rick Feb 2012 #150
They'll just sell them somewhere else - TBF Feb 2012 #151
Collectively the American middle class still has a lot of capital. They want that capital. rhett o rick Feb 2012 #152
No, once again bipartisan neoliberalism supports short sighted vested interests and upward transfers PufPuf23 Feb 2012 #44
You are right it's the Republicans, but not what you think SunsetDreams Feb 2012 #62
Thanks for all those details. proverbialwisdom Feb 2012 #128
Du rec. Nt xchrom Feb 2012 #2
It's a continuing downward spiral for many, but if the markets go up too many think this is RKP5637 Feb 2012 #3
Springfield, MO, where I live, is losing its processing center The Genealogist Feb 2012 #4
The funding requirement was done to force USPS into bankruptcy so the RKP5637 Feb 2012 #10
USPS will be gone in ten years, so what happens if they don't fund retiree benefits now? FarCenter Feb 2012 #26
Why would they be gone in 10 years, they can be competitive in similar things to RKP5637 Feb 2012 #27
They are unlikely to compete with FedEx and UPS FarCenter Feb 2012 #28
I had read at one time that another problem USPS has is having to deliver to every RKP5637 Feb 2012 #29
It is an unworkable hybrid of a government service and a private enterprise FarCenter Feb 2012 #56
USPS delivers many packages on behalf of both UPS and FedEx brentspeak Feb 2012 #141
Let's see. 75/10 = 7.5 years per year. New Yawker Feb 2012 #127
This is what I thought was the real reason that UPS is going bankrupt.It happened before Pres.. The Wielding Truth Feb 2012 #54
Internet killed usps Celebration Feb 2012 #5
Its not that he isn't aware. He helped sponsor the bill in 2006. JNathanK Feb 2012 #17
You ProSense Feb 2012 #46
The vote on the Postal Bill was unanimous. former9thward Feb 2012 #60
Up is down, and Obama is never wrong. bahrbearian Feb 2012 #64
Well ProSense Feb 2012 #67
It was ProSense Feb 2012 #65
OMG! You're kidding me! uranus is my home Feb 2012 #103
Paper mail is obsolete. FarCenter Feb 2012 #22
It should go directly into the recycling bin. That's what I do. RBInMaine Feb 2012 #70
Well, no it isn't They_Live Feb 2012 #75
"Just because it's obsolete for you doesn't make it so for everyone else." Tarheel_Dem Feb 2012 #107
Is is possible to email a package? brentspeak Feb 2012 #139
And you don't particularly strike me as someone who can be lumped in with "any" of "us". Tarheel_Dem Feb 2012 #144
With email you can also send photos, clippings, drawings, as attachments FarCenter Feb 2012 #109
This is NOT the way out of recession!. . . n/t annabanana Feb 2012 #6
Juan Gonzalez's research on the early US media showed EFerrari Feb 2012 #23
They lost newspapers because of the market. former9thward Feb 2012 #74
Sanders: Postal Service Plan ‘Deeply Flawed' ProSense Feb 2012 #9
K&R proverbialwisdom Feb 2012 #129
Senators Support Saving the Postal Service ProSense Feb 2012 #11
Being that it was Democrats who helped make this happen... MrSlayer Feb 2012 #12
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #14
Waxman and Davis are not the ones responsible for the prefunding requirement brentspeak Feb 2012 #16
I guess I can't blame every one of them. JNathanK Feb 2012 #18
Well, this should all be a nice boon the private sector. I bet UPS and Fedex is funding Darrel Issa. JNathanK Feb 2012 #13
They closed distribution centers - consolidating sorting - not post offices bhikkhu Feb 2012 #15
Post office closings brentspeak Feb 2012 #20
What you linked to is post offices involved in a study SunsetDreams Feb 2012 #24
Many, if not all, are tring to avoid closure through cost cutting and efficiency measures bhikkhu Feb 2012 #25
Out of curiosity.... A HERETIC I AM Feb 2012 #19
Every month I still use the USPS for my bills nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #31
"2006 bill, if they did not have to do that, they'd be TURNING A PROFIT RIGHT NOW." SunsetDreams Feb 2012 #35
Actually the post service agrees with me nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #36
Do the people at the post office who agree with you SunsetDreams Feb 2012 #38
As I said independent groups nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #39
So it's not the USPS, SunsetDreams Feb 2012 #43
Last mile nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #66
I must thank you, you prompted my research SunsetDreams Feb 2012 #78
You welcome nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #84
I write letters and pay bills by mail all the time. haele Feb 2012 #33
We do a lot of eBay and we ship just about everything USPS, except for some large and RKP5637 Feb 2012 #37
I send and receive mail on a consistent basis.. Fumesucker Feb 2012 #40
I still use snail mail. bvar22 Feb 2012 #58
One of my businesses.. girl gone mad Feb 2012 #105
If you paid market rates, your shipping costs would triple? boppers Feb 2012 #123
No, the USPS is running at a major loss because of the prefunding requirement brentspeak Feb 2012 #146
I pay all my bills via the usps unapatriciated Feb 2012 #155
Bernie's got a bill "that's getting support and interest" to do away gateley Feb 2012 #21
Here's a link that talks about it ... RKP5637 Feb 2012 #30
Thank you! nt gateley Feb 2012 #99
Rural America and its many teabaggers do want to pay for maintaining this service level high density Feb 2012 #32
Where's the connection between rural areas and the Tea Party? brentspeak Feb 2012 #34
Lots of libs live in rural America MadHound Feb 2012 #50
This is insanity Oasis_ Feb 2012 #41
Wrong. The repukes did this. Zoeisright Feb 2012 #42
now now, don't bring fact into brent's campaign against obama... dionysus Feb 2012 #45
^Post of the Day^ Cutting through the lies about the situation with the USPS. Major Hogwash Feb 2012 #55
That's correct, but all you did was repeat my own link brentspeak Feb 2012 #59
You should get your facts straight. former9thward Feb 2012 #63
WOW! Fudders are working new DU hard too uponit7771 Feb 2012 #148
The USPS isnt a jobs program... its a business. DCBob Feb 2012 #47
It's not a business, it's a public service necessary for a functioning society. jpgray Feb 2012 #48
It still needs to be run like a business to survive. DCBob Feb 2012 #51
Funny no one complains about military RIF's throwing thousands out of work. Ikonoklast Feb 2012 #53
Tell me would you be able to pay your thirty year loan in two? nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #68
Dumb comment. DCBob Feb 2012 #71
Really? How so? nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #76
The Issa comment. for one thing. DCBob Feb 2012 #86
As chairman for ways and means nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #87
I dont closely follow the activities of that idiot. DCBob Feb 2012 #90
You mean center right corporatist dems nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #92
never mind.. DCBob Feb 2012 #94
Darrell Issa is a Republican, not a Democrat SunsetDreams Feb 2012 #96
I think most people here know who Issa is nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #98
What other businesses are artificially burdened with a bankrupting prefunding requirement? brentspeak Feb 2012 #61
Regardless they are still a bloated obsolete operation. DCBob Feb 2012 #72
Again you have no clue what you speak off nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #77
no clue??.. mail volume has dropped dramatically over the past 10 years. DCBob Feb 2012 #89
And package handling has gone up nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #91
Package handling volume is tiny compared to 1st class mail. DCBob Feb 2012 #93
Code for privatized. nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #95
The USPS is not a business.. girl gone mad Feb 2012 #108
The post office is not mandated by the US Constitution FarCenter Feb 2012 #114
shame Sea-Dog Feb 2012 #49
With the internet and their pension costs, their cashflow is in a world of hurt. Something needs to RBInMaine Feb 2012 #69
Again, if they were not tp required to fund pensions nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #80
Wait ProSense Feb 2012 #73
Obama Didn't Hand-Select Him And Can't Fire Him Either, By Law? SunsetDreams Feb 2012 #83
Well, ProSense Feb 2012 #85
Classic misinformation from the OP. grantcart Feb 2012 #106
Oh, he understands. The intent is to geek tragedy Feb 2012 #122
Bingo, like to call this one a shit stirrer. Pisces Feb 2012 #126
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #143
As opposed to publishing blatant lies like claiming that Donahoe geek tragedy Feb 2012 #149
Are you insane??? I have not had hundreds of posts deleted and have not accused but maybe 2 people Pisces Feb 2012 #153
Obama has the power to stop postal closures girl gone mad Feb 2012 #110
No he doesn't and that is a law SunsetDreams Feb 2012 #112
You're wrong. girl gone mad Feb 2012 #131
Absolutely not wrong, that is talking about Appointees by the President SunsetDreams Feb 2012 #132
Crickets Swede Feb 2012 #147
This quote calls the whole basis of the o.p. into doubt. I'm so glad you're here. Tarheel_Dem Feb 2012 #115
I am happy it was not 350,000. Rex Feb 2012 #79
I hate that this has happened. But people don't use the USPS much anymore, do they? Honeycombe8 Feb 2012 #82
Who needs Republicans when we have Democrats willing to lie about Obama. geek tragedy Feb 2012 #88
Well, ProSense Feb 2012 #101
This is serious misinformation. DevonRex Feb 2012 #97
I find ProSense Feb 2012 #100
It's the same old crowd that will rec anything (and I seriously mean ANYTHING) Number23 Feb 2012 #154
Will brentspeak amend the OP? great white snark Feb 2012 #102
The Republicans appointed Donohoe? brentspeak Feb 2012 #137
Obama did not appoint Donohoe, your OP is wrong SunsetDreams Feb 2012 #140
I think you're right about Obama not appointing Donohoe brentspeak Feb 2012 #145
Happy days are here again uranus is my home Feb 2012 #104
Welcome, and ProSense Feb 2012 #111
If we mail all those "business reply mail" cards and envelopes, would the USPS earn more money? FarCenter Feb 2012 #113
Will any of the Obama haters who rec'd this withdraw geek tragedy Feb 2012 #119
JUst trying to live up to the execptation of needing so many post QA_IT_Pro Feb 2012 #121
So many lies, no need to bother with arguing, as there is no intent of being truthful. boppers Feb 2012 #124
Someone needs to file a lawsuit against the Republicans and the administration re: PO New Yawker Feb 2012 #125
"But no, Obama is content to let it go." Tarheel_Dem Feb 2012 #133
You must have flunked civics--the President can't override laws that have been geek tragedy Feb 2012 #134
155,000 jobs by 2016 smoopie Feb 2012 #136
Alles for zee Privat Sectorrrrr fascisthunter Feb 2012 #138
Well, ProSense Feb 2012 #142
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama admin silent as USP...»Reply #140