Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Junkdrawer

(27,993 posts)
6. Regional war, or worse....
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 09:41 AM
Aug 2013
Russia to create Mediterranean fleet to protect Syria

During the Cold War, the Mediterranean was the most important area of strategic struggle between the West and the USSR. Many years have passed, a lot has happened, but the importance of the Mediterranean Sea has remained the same. Russia, a successor of the USSR, has lost some of its influence in the region over the years. It appears, though, that the country is not going to sit on its hands watching others taking its place under the Mediterranean sun.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, speaking in front of the military, announced plans to restore the permanent presence of the Russian Federation Fleet in the Mediterranean. Putin believes that such a move is not an act of "saber rattling." The president said that Russia had its own interests in the Mediterranean that are related to the national security of the country. The region is strategically important to Russia, and the country plans to deploy its warships in the Mediterranean Sea on a permanent basis.

According to the press service of the Defense Ministry of Russia, the Russian naval task force in the Mediterranean will include about ten ships of various classes of the North, Baltic and Black Sea fleets on a rotational basis. Depending on tasks, the number of warships in the compound can be increased.

….

http://english.pravda.ru/russia/politics/12-06-2013/124816-russia_mediterranean_fleet-0/


Possible naval showdown: U.S. 6th Fleet vs. Russian Mediterranean Task Force

With the possibility of chemical weapons being used in the ongoing Syrian Civil War, the Obama Administration has upped the ante by ordering a fourth ballistic missile armed warship into the Eastern Mediterranean area, as reported by both the news portal IsraelHayom.com and the Associated Press via ABC News on Aug. 25, 2013.

The USS Mahan has joined her sister ships, the USS Gravely, the USS Barry and the USS Rampage, in the waters off Syria if Barack Obama orders a cruise missile strike against presumably the forces of Syrian President Bashar Hafez al-Assad due to accusations by Hezbollah, Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda-allied rebels against Assad of allegedly using chemical weapons against 1,000 Syrian civilians.

For his part, Assad denies the accusations and blames the rebel forces of fabricating the claim in hopes of garnering Western military support.

To date, there has been no independent or objective verification if any chemical attack by either side has been launched and/or civilians have been killed or wounded.

http://www.examiner.com/article/possible-naval-showdown-u-s-6th-fleet-vs-russian-mediterranean-task-force


http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=edit&forum=1002&thread=3535402

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A concerted effort could knock off Assad's government Scootaloo Aug 2013 #1
it would not be easy to knock off the Assad regime. But if the U.S. commits itself to airstrikes Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #9
Dead innocents. Iggo Aug 2013 #2
That, and terrorist recruits. n/t cherokeeprogressive Aug 2013 #16
It will accelerate the process of igniting a wider regional war, with the US a target from multiple leveymg Aug 2013 #3
Regional war, or worse.... Junkdrawer Aug 2013 #6
No "Best Case Scenario"......Worst Case: Dubya Dubya Three LongTomH Aug 2013 #14
More profit for the MIC. RC Aug 2013 #4
No option for "other" dixiegrrrrl Aug 2013 #5
Partitioning may be necessary. moondust Aug 2013 #15
dead Syrians, MIC profits KG Aug 2013 #7
Higher profits for petroleum corporations as gasoline climbs past $5.00 a gallon Coyotl Aug 2013 #8
See our glorious victories in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan for clues. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2013 #10
A lot of dead people, cpwm17 Aug 2013 #11
Power vacuum. NuclearDem Aug 2013 #12
Throwing more oily rags and matches into a conflicted region of the planet??? NightWatcher Aug 2013 #13
$6/gallon gas. Myrina Aug 2013 #17
Once the US and other powers take a hand, they will escalate if they don't get the result they want kenny blankenship Aug 2013 #18
I agree. Limited strikes will not change anything. Which means ever increasing intervention is Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #19
one more Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #20
It would open up Iran for attack. Democracyinkind Aug 2013 #21
another kick for another day Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #22
One more step towards Iran nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What would be the most li...»Reply #6