General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama Gives Bush "Absolute Immunity" For Everything [View all]TheTruthBeKnown
(72 posts)Compare the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi men, women, children, toddlers and babies (in addition to the killing of 4488 US troops) to my example. Should I also not talk about the war crimes Bush and gang committed because it too was 'sickening'. I guess I shouldn't have mentioned the killing of babies and toddlers even though they are facts.
I didn't describe rape in detail. I merely mentioned it to drive home a point. Do you feel hundreds of thousands of murders is less sickening than two illusionary rapes? You need to step back and look at the big picture. I didn't joke about rape. I'd never do that.
Just what situations would you feel ok with someone mentioning the word rape? Or do you want to be a one person censorship board to decide what can or cannot be said.
I'm sorry I offended your sensibilities but two illusionary rapes is less offensive than hundreds of thousands of murders.
Feel free to voice your opinion on letting war criminals and mass murderers go free. That was the intent of my post. If you can't see that then reread it again and maybe you'll be able to understand the full context of what I obviously wrote about.