Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ginsburg calls out Roberts [View all]Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)44. Be sure to read the long detailed article in the New York Times, link below
Court Is One of Most Activist, Ginsburg Says, Vowing to Stay
August 24, 2013
WASHINGTON Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 80, vowed in an interview to stay on the Supreme Court as long as her health and intellect remained strong, saying she was fully engaged in her work as the leader of the liberal opposition on what she called one of the most activist courts in history.
In wide-ranging remarks in her chambers on Friday that touched on affirmative action, abortion and same-sex marriage, Justice Ginsburg said she had made a mistake in joining a 2009 opinion that laid the groundwork for the courts decision in June effectively striking down the heart of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The recent decision, she said, was stunning in terms of activism.
Unless they have a book to sell, Supreme Court justices rarely give interviews. Justice Ginsburg has given several this summer, perhaps in reaction to calls from some liberals that she step down in time for President Obama to name her successor.
On Friday, she said repeatedly that the identity of the president who would appoint her replacement did not figure in her retirement planning.
There will be a president after this one, and Im hopeful that that president will be a fine president, she said.
-snip-
Full article here: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/25/us/court-is-one-of-most-activist-ginsburg-says-vowing-to-stay.html?_r=0
And on DU here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251321035
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Right. Why not focus on getting Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas and Alito to step down?
Octafish
Aug 2013
#20
*snort* Thanks for the laugh! I can just imagine Boner's gang writing up articals of impeachment
madinmaryland
Aug 2013
#45
I share this frustration. But to be fair, Kagan might be about as liberal as Stevens.
Lasher
Aug 2013
#37
Smoking old tennis shoes? Like the President would put another liberal on SCOTUS
Katashi_itto
Aug 2013
#49
Your etiquette lesson has as much value as is your view of Justice Ginsburg. Zero. (nt)
Paladin
Aug 2013
#30
Thank you, Justice Ginsburg! You have a better mind than the corrupt 5 brains put together.
mountain grammy
Aug 2013
#9
Can you imagine how frustrating it must be for her to have fought all that she needed
Squinch
Aug 2013
#11
not sure about that, but she recently said she regretted her bush v. gore vote
noiretextatique
Aug 2013
#42
I believe she is holding the New Democrat Justices together. I shudder to think
merrily
Aug 2013
#24
I do believe that the Supreme Court is one more reason that Elizabeth Warren needs to run in 2016!
cascadiance
Aug 2013
#28
Shut up and just quit your job, because we are scared that a Republican will win in 2016,
Nye Bevan
Aug 2013
#48