Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 08:46 PM Aug 2013

County Attorney will not release autopsies of Yarnell 19 without a court order. [View all]

http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/region_northern_az/prescott/county-withholds-autopsies-of-19-granite-mountain-hotshots

The Yavapai County attorney says autopsy reports and photos of the scene where 19 firefighters were killed in Arizona won't be released without a court order.

A letter sent to media organizations Monday says the records are being withheld under exemptions in Arizona public records law.

County Attorney Sheila Polk wrote that while the reports and photos are considered public records, the privacy interests of the firefighters' families override the public interest in their release. She was writing for the county sheriff and medical examiner, and the Maricopa County medical examiner, which performed the autopsies.

Numerous news agencies including The Associated Press have requested records regarding the June 30 deaths near Yarnell.

Media attorney David Bodney says courts have held autopsy reports to be public, and scene photos are also often released.



This seems kind of ridiculous. The public deserves to know what happened. Especially since it was such an unprecedented event.
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The autopsies won't tell you what happened. enlightenment Aug 2013 #1
There is absolutely a rational reason to release both the reports and the autopsies. Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #2
What do you suggest they autopsy report will say? enlightenment Aug 2013 #6
It would absolutely serve the interest of the county and the state to conceal any wrong doing... Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #7
What I'm arguing is that enlightenment Aug 2013 #9
I'm not saying this is a cover up. Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #11
But you're assuming that there is wrong-doing. enlightenment Aug 2013 #17
+1. n/t FSogol Aug 2013 #10
I agree. djean111 Aug 2013 #3
You cannot think of a single reason to release the photos? Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #5
fucking attorney what an asshole gopiscrap Aug 2013 #4
Unrec. Sometimes accidents happen. Everything isn't a conspiracy. FSogol Aug 2013 #8
They were public servants who died while on duty. En masse, might I add... Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #12
No, the public doesn't need to gawk at the photos. FSogol Aug 2013 #13
Are you suggesting it can be investigated without public disclosure? Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #14
A final report can be released. The dead firemen don't need to be paraded around FSogol Aug 2013 #15
Public disclosure is a standard, not an exception. Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #16
So you would be happy to read the autopsy reports and not look at charred corpses, then, I assume. djean111 Aug 2013 #18
I'm not sure you understand the definition of "parading." Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #19
Oh, yes I do understand. djean111 Aug 2013 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»County Attorney will not ...