Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama doubles-down w/NYTs James Risen: rat on your sources or 'Go straight to jail. Do not pass go' [View all]treestar
(82,383 posts)5. Another story used to confuse people who don't understand the issues:
There is no First Amendment testimonial privilege, absolute or qualified, that protects a reporter from being compelled to testify by the prosecution or the defense in criminal proceedings about criminal conduct that the reporter personally witnessed or participated in, absent a showing of bad faith, harassment, or other such non-legitimate motive, even though the reporter promised confidentiality to his source. In Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972), the Supreme Court in no uncertain terms rejected the existence of such a privilege. In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller, 438 F.3d 1141, 1146 (D.C. Cir. 2006).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama doubles-down w/NYTs James Risen: rat on your sources or 'Go straight to jail. Do not pass go' [View all]
99th_Monkey
Aug 2013
OP
What the heck is wrong with this admin continually going after reporters? I can't remember ever...
Little Star
Aug 2013
#1
the question is what constitutes a crime,. leaking the doings of our gov. seems like public service!
Civilization2
Aug 2013
#28
Like the banksters, or the corporate pillagers,. or the warmonger politicos that kill millions?
Civilization2
Aug 2013
#36
Funny you should think it is settled law. The SC ruled, in the Ellsberg case that the NYT
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#44
That prosecutors even NEED Risen's testimony at all, is highly questionable.
99th_Monkey
Aug 2013
#7
Because no where in MY copy of the US Constitution does it state that Banksters are protected
99th_Monkey
Aug 2013
#42
Congress shall make no law "abridging the freedom of speech, or of THE PRESS"
99th_Monkey
Aug 2013
#53
You did not think he meant that classified information could be leaked whenever?
treestar
Aug 2013
#32
Bet the same people defending this now rightfully would have torn Bush a new
forestpath
Aug 2013
#38
If the White House cannot imprison journalists how can we call ourselves free?!
Demo_Chris
Aug 2013
#65