Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

leftstreet

(39,827 posts)

9. That headline is DoublePlusGood BULLSHIT

Reply to ProSense (Original post)

Tue Aug 27, 2013, 04:47 PM

Aug 2013

Not yours, the article

The article only states the WH isn't looking for 'regime change.' It doesn't state a military strike won't be used. Just no 'regime change'

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obama won't use military strike to oust Assad [View all] ProSense Aug 2013 OP

That was techincally the approach in Libya as well . . . nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #1

yep. cali Aug 2013 #3

In the beginning, maybe. But, when the time came to take Sirte, bombing helped do a lot of this: leveymg Aug 2013 #10

Most people are againt any military strike Harmony Blue Aug 2013 #2

Yeah---let's throw a couple of Cruise Missiles at him.. trumad Aug 2013 #4

If the military strikes the U.S. is proposing Harmony Blue Aug 2013 #7

Basically what Cameron's saying BeyondGeography Aug 2013 #5

Weak sauce. n/t Laelth Aug 2013 #6

I don't want to see our forces in another war Just Saying Aug 2013 #8

That headline is DoublePlusGood BULLSHIT leftstreet Aug 2013 #9

I agree with you ProSense... kentuck Aug 2013 #11

Well, that's comforting. progressoid Aug 2013 #12