Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Photo: Naval Airpower [View all]

sad sally

(2,627 posts)
28. Ah, the intoxication of solving the worlds problems with a fleet of killing machines.
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 06:11 PM
Feb 2012

Wait until a fleet of combat drones, without the need of humans to point out targets, fly in formation like this - then terrorist will really be on the run and Americans will finally feel safe.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Photo: Naval Airpower [View all] Johnny Rico Feb 2012 OP
Yep, we know doubt have the most advanced military in the world and then we have teddy51 Feb 2012 #1
But there's absolutely no connection between the two! DavidDvorkin Feb 2012 #2
I know that, but just saying how ridiculous it is to be wasting money on a huge teddy51 Feb 2012 #3
I was making the same point DavidDvorkin Feb 2012 #5
Money could be spent elsewhere. Logical Feb 2012 #4
Yes, indeed DavidDvorkin Feb 2012 #6
Precisely Sherman A1 Feb 2012 #8
+1000 ellisonz Feb 2012 #10
U$A! U$A! Protecting the profits of the MIC. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2012 #7
About $830 Million in Tax Dollars pubsrpigs Feb 2012 #9
thats closer to $1.5 billion dollars unhappycamper Feb 2012 #88
And you're not in love with militarism? ellisonz Feb 2012 #11
And the answer to your rhetorical question is... Johnny Rico Feb 2012 #13
So why post this? ellisonz Feb 2012 #14
One doesn't need to be a militarist to appreciate the beauty of formation flying. Johnny Rico Feb 2012 #16
How do you respond to the criticisms upthread... ellisonz Feb 2012 #17
I would answer them as follows: Johnny Rico Feb 2012 #18
So if you were going to balance the Federal budget... ellisonz Feb 2012 #22
I choose...both. Johnny Rico Feb 2012 #54
Glad to see you want to gut Medicare/Medicaid to support your war machine! ellisonz Feb 2012 #60
Hey, at least our military will still look fucking cool as hell Hugabear Feb 2012 #66
That's the important thing... ellisonz Feb 2012 #68
In the 1970's and 1980's we faced an enemy that had (somewhat) comparable power Hippo_Tron Feb 2012 #35
And how has that changed? Clames Feb 2012 #40
You can get a lot of nice things... ellisonz Feb 2012 #42
It sure has... Clames Feb 2012 #43
So I'll pose the same question to you... ellisonz Feb 2012 #44
Oh I'm sorry... Clames Feb 2012 #45
Actually there is... ellisonz Feb 2012 #46
I addressed my sore thumb... Clames Feb 2012 #47
So which is it... ellisonz Feb 2012 #48
Like I already said... Clames Feb 2012 #49
It's about as simple as it as it can get... ellisonz Feb 2012 #50
Try that sometime... Clames Feb 2012 #52
lol ellisonz Feb 2012 #53
I don't have to make an assumption... Clames Feb 2012 #56
Ooohhh a narrow view... ellisonz Feb 2012 #59
Laughable still. Clames Feb 2012 #73
During the war years, yes defense spending boomed... ellisonz Feb 2012 #75
Academic study? Clames Feb 2012 #76
Whatever. ellisonz Feb 2012 #78
Let's count how many things you are wrong on here. Clames Feb 2012 #81
Dodge. ellisonz Feb 2012 #82
LULZ. Clames Feb 2012 #84
Keep drowning. ellisonz Feb 2012 #87
Your crystal ball is failing...again. Clames Feb 2012 #96
Such pro-military-industrial complex, anti-New Deal arguments! ellisonz Feb 2012 #99
I don't see a problem... Clames Feb 2012 #19
Careful...you'll be called a militarist! Johnny Rico Feb 2012 #20
Oh I wouldn't care... Clames Feb 2012 #21
All hail the military-industrial complex! ellisonz Feb 2012 #27
You can do the hailing... Clames Feb 2012 #32
So where have you been dude? unhappycamper Feb 2012 #89
Not as many places as I'd like to yet... Clames Feb 2012 #95
What's your MOS? unhappycamper Feb 2012 #102
Started as a 91C... Clames Feb 2012 #103
You know, the guy who sweeps the launch pad at Canaveral DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2012 #100
Ah, the intoxication of solving the worlds problems with a fleet of killing machines. sad sally Feb 2012 #28
So why title it "naval airpower'? Your first concern was the power it projects muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #57
The title and descriptive text were copied and pasted from the website where Johnny Rico Feb 2012 #62
And it's a militaristic website (nt) muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #67
It's a website abour miliary matters. In any case, it Johnny Rico Feb 2012 #69
Beauty can be found in all things NickB79 Feb 2012 #64
I think these useless machines are ugly. 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #74
Cool! A tiger cruise has family members on board. It's like open house for sailors kids Brother Buzz Feb 2012 #12
The single largest individual user of refined petroleum products on Earth Ikonoklast Feb 2012 #15
The US military uses 360K barrels of oil a day. Spider Jerusalem Feb 2012 #31
The military is the most sacred of our Sacred Cows and loves to strut its $tuff. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2012 #23
"Now, if they could only win a war." ellisonz Feb 2012 #24
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #26
As in what? Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2012 #30
You see... ellisonz Feb 2012 #34
USA-USA-USA! MadHound Feb 2012 #25
nerf fascisthunter Feb 2012 #29
And NOW here's a picture of a plane with a pancake hat. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #33
Yes, lets bring our military down to thesame level it was in 1941, #17 in the world. oneshooter Feb 2012 #36
Which was the last war we won. You might be on to something. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2012 #37
What potential existential threats do you see... ellisonz Feb 2012 #39
The military is a lovely thing to those of a fascist bent. nt Bonobo Feb 2012 #38
Anybody look at our military scorecard..? Bigmack Feb 2012 #41
" Our military is huge, powerful, and amazingly inefficient at its job." ellisonz Feb 2012 #93
Oh, look!! they can fly in formation...whoppie do n/t Ichingcarpenter Feb 2012 #51
Naval airpower is only useful against targets at sea or near the coast FarCenter Feb 2012 #55
With the current generation of smart standoff weapoms now available, Johnny Rico Feb 2012 #63
Translation: Will come in handy if the GOP ever gets their wet dream of a war with Iran. ellisonz Feb 2012 #70
They've already come in handy. Johnny Rico Feb 2012 #71
Which didn't require multiple... ellisonz Feb 2012 #72
Ok, regarding aircraft carrier battle groups, let's follow President Obama's advice: Johnny Rico Feb 2012 #77
And it should be cut even more...but he's got to play politics. ellisonz Feb 2012 #79
I'm sorry, but the idea of war with China is absolutely daft. Selatius Feb 2012 #80
Don't bring reason into this... ellisonz Feb 2012 #83
A few of them are always undergoing maintenance FarCenter Feb 2012 #91
Afghanistan is near the coast? Angleae Feb 2012 #86
Kabul is about 800 miles inland, Mazari Sarif is about 1000 miles FarCenter Feb 2012 #90
They were using navy tankers (F-18, EA-6, S-3). Angleae Feb 2012 #98
Let me know when we make one of these things... bvar22 Feb 2012 #58
Awesome Sky Glans! whatchamacallit Feb 2012 #61
That is cause. Here is effect... LanternWaste Feb 2012 #65
Photo: Infantry power Bonobo Feb 2012 #85
One cbu should take care of that formation... deaniac21 Feb 2012 #97
My point is... Bonobo Feb 2012 #101
Beautiful photo kctim Feb 2012 #92
this one must have been a bitch to do correctly: Blue_Tires Feb 2012 #94
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Photo: Naval Airpower»Reply #28