Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Electronic Frontier Foundation to award Greenwald for "clear and credible news and analysis" [View all]Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Electronic Frontier Foundation to award Greenwald for "clear and credible news and analysis" [View all]
David Krout
Aug 2013
OP
Can you point to one incidence where GG was shown to have reported wrongly or "lied"?
Civilization2
Aug 2013
#9
Again, can you point to ANYTHING he has misreported ? OR just more argumentum ad hominem,.
Civilization2
Aug 2013
#16
Psst, just one thing, you don't have to go into EVERYTHING, just give us one thing he
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#94
So you got no evidence nor an example of mendacity, just some crack pot conspiracy theory to foist.
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#28
Well, on Democratic Undergound we like the Electronic Frontier Foundation for reasons including:
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#6
Oh, no that's where the Thrid Way 'say anything centrists' are headed, the Democratic Party is
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#64
that was his original question, the conversation changed after that. That should have been obvious.
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#40
Again, his question was simple and clear 'why should anyone on DU care about this'?
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#66
No, the OP sets the subject, not a nattering crew making crazed analogies and asking questions they
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#75
As a long time and actual supporter of their work, I think this award is fitting well given.
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#15
Ah a personal attack devoid of any other content. Good stuff you got there, no facts but a lecture
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#36
Again, you are misinterpreting someone's comments. Robb's comments were obvious. nt
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#38
No smear. He disagreed with EFFs opinion in one situation.Characterizing that as "a smear" is a joke
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#45
After mentioning the two other seem worthy. You keep forgetting that part. nt
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#70
Sorry, no one on DU on any side of anything turns their thinking over to some group's say so.
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#10
Steve, a 'jounalist' posting on DU slamming the EFF is about as ironic and vapid as it gets.
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#21
As usual, you invent things that other people said instead of addressing their actual comments.
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#26
They are the group that is the subject of the OP, so when you said 'some group' did you mean
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#30
It should be obvious. It's generic. No one here turns their thinking over to any group.
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#31
The Nobel was a seconday exaple you were offering. You were comparing the reaction to the Nobel
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#71
Which makes it obvious it was a more general comment I was making. See how that works?
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#73
The naysayers are clearly responding to the goring of one of their scared cows,.
Civilization2
Aug 2013
#19
Greenwald's thinking and analysis has already been shown to be suspect throughout Bush's 1st term
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#35
Nope, just as with any other person or group, each instance is evaluated on its merits. nt
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#46
IWR was before the UN Weapons inspector reports were written. Greenwald continued
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#49
Exactly! Smearmaster Greenwald's smear campaign against George W. Bush
Douglas Carpenter
Aug 2013
#53
So trust is the issue, not the facts of the reporting, the "analysis"? Really?
Civilization2
Aug 2013
#60
With thousands of journalists and pundits around, I don't need to read someone who trusted Bush for
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#67
But you supported Hagel, a Yes vote on Iraq and a Republican for Sec of Defense
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#76
1st, no, I did not support 'Yes' on IWR. Second, no, you are conflating trusting someone's analysis
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#77
I have noticed a pattern - One of the methods of this PR tag team has lately been to hold back a few
Dragonfli
Aug 2013
#85
It is not a 'blow' to anyone with objective viewpoints on this or any other matter.
randome
Aug 2013
#78
I was under the impression the 50-cent brigade was being run out of Booz-Allen. n/t
backscatter712
Aug 2013
#83
Wow, that's quite an honor for a journalist. And definitely validation of his work which he
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#93