Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)How many dead Americans would an attack on Syria be worth? [View all]
No one seems to be talking about that fact that there could actually be US deaths resulting from any attack on Syria. How many would this be worth to you?
| 22 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
| 0 US Deaths - I oppose US attacking Syria | |
19 (86%) |
|
| 0 US Deaths - I support attacking Syria, but US deaths are impossible | |
2 (9%) |
|
| 100 US Deaths - I support attacking Syria unless there are more than 100 US deaths | |
0 (0%) |
|
| 1,000 US Deaths - I support attacking Syria unless there are more than 1000 US deaths | |
0 (0%) |
|
| 10,000 US Deaths - I support attacking Syria unless there are more than 10000 US deaths | |
0 (0%) |
|
| It doesn\'t matterhow many US deaths it causes - I support attacking Syria | |
1 (5%) |
|
| 2 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
| Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
|
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US deaths, Turkish deaths, Israeli deaths, Iraqi deaths, Lebanese deaths, and oh yeah, SYRIAN deaths
Scootaloo
Aug 2013
#1
No Americans will die, unless they hit their head and fall down after they push the button to launch
MADem
Aug 2013
#7
No one is saying "decapitate" the Syrian state--they're saying give it a close haircut.
MADem
Aug 2013
#31
Your link makes the point--a compromise was reached. A deal was struck. Argument done.
MADem
Aug 2013
#34
The "repercussions" are a result of al Assad's nasty habit of gassing his citizens in an attempt
MADem
Aug 2013
#36
Yep, because our military interventions are always successful and without consequence.
progressoid
Aug 2013
#37
Well, no one is claiming that, but this is a strike against property, not people... nt
MADem
Aug 2013
#38
?? Honestly that a very fine line to draw. "People" are very likely to be injured/killed
anneboleyn
Aug 2013
#40
If they're not standing next to those bunkers, those runways and those aircraft, they should be OK.
MADem
Aug 2013
#41
This is a targeted action to eliminate a threat. A war requires two or more players engaging
MADem
Aug 2013
#52
The only ones frothing at the mouth are Syrian terrorists after eating their human prey.
David__77
Aug 2013
#17
You need to stop babbling about terrorists and read about what the solution entails.
MADem
Aug 2013
#25
I just provided you a link that proves otherwise. You didn't have time to read it.
MADem
Aug 2013
#27
Better question..How many thousands of innocent Syrians will die from continuing chemical weapons?
jessie04
Aug 2013
#8
Not one drop of American blood, not one American life is worth an attack on Syria.
wild bird
Aug 2013
#24
Soldier's lives are an expendable resource to chicken hawks on both sides of the aisle n/t
whatchamacallit
Aug 2013
#32
Well, the sort of people who want war generally can't be expected to give a damn about Syrian lives.
Scootaloo
Aug 2013
#47