Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

djean111

(14,255 posts)

20. Oh, yes I do understand.

Reply to Gravitycollapse (Reply #19)

Wed Aug 28, 2013, 10:46 AM

Aug 2013

Were those pictures going to be released to you, and only you, confidentially? You don't think that news outlets are also requesting them? They would be all over the internet. Paraded, as it were. Just because you personally would not do it, doesn't mean it would not happen.
Anyway, what would looking at those pictures prove? Seems to me the written words would tell the tale.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

County Attorney will not release autopsies of Yarnell 19 without a court order. [View all] Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 OP

The autopsies won't tell you what happened. enlightenment Aug 2013 #1

There is absolutely a rational reason to release both the reports and the autopsies. Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #2

What do you suggest they autopsy report will say? enlightenment Aug 2013 #6

It would absolutely serve the interest of the county and the state to conceal any wrong doing... Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #7

What I'm arguing is that enlightenment Aug 2013 #9

I'm not saying this is a cover up. Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #11

But you're assuming that there is wrong-doing. enlightenment Aug 2013 #17

+1. n/t FSogol Aug 2013 #10

I agree. djean111 Aug 2013 #3

You cannot think of a single reason to release the photos? Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #5

fucking attorney what an asshole gopiscrap Aug 2013 #4

Unrec. Sometimes accidents happen. Everything isn't a conspiracy. FSogol Aug 2013 #8

They were public servants who died while on duty. En masse, might I add... Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #12

No, the public doesn't need to gawk at the photos. FSogol Aug 2013 #13

Are you suggesting it can be investigated without public disclosure? Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #14

A final report can be released. The dead firemen don't need to be paraded around FSogol Aug 2013 #15

Public disclosure is a standard, not an exception. Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #16

So you would be happy to read the autopsy reports and not look at charred corpses, then, I assume. djean111 Aug 2013 #18

I'm not sure you understand the definition of "parading." Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #19

Oh, yes I do understand. djean111 Aug 2013 #20