I posed the question regarding evidence of chems used...

[Agnosticsherbet]

15. In the OP "So what happens if it's found out that the rebels used the chems . . . ."

. "So what happens if it's found out that the rebels used the chems and we bomb the Syrian government? "

Doctors without borders has reported over three hundred deaths in this incident (I assume they are not a front for the NSA, CIA, or some other nefarious imperial organization), and that the victims were civilians in rebel territory. So if the rebels attacked their own supporters, wives, and children with Chemical weapons, what would be their motive?

I've seen this meme elsewhere, hypotheticals that "the rebels did it." Such a question doesn't pass the smell test or the logic test. Personally, I think this meme is used to muddy the waters. We have an incident, and the first reported, where the Syrian government is reported to have used Chemical weapons. Independent verification by NGO's on the ground testify to the size, scope, and victims of the attack. It is a gross violation of international norms in effect since 1925.

Do we say, "It's none of our business how many children and innocent civilians they kill."

Do we do something to dissuade this behavior?