So I asked my friends from Syria about my "I support intervention" stance.

[Bluenorthwest]

10. That's some characterization of your thread, considering you did not even respond to my

post which pointed out some facts about the World Court that your OP made clear you did not understand. The impression I got from your thread was that facts and discussion were not at all your goal. I do not find much good in making a case for war which includes factually incorrect points. The case for war, if it is to be made, requires full attention to detail and no moments of fantasia.
And of course Ida, this being a civil war in Syria, you can find Syrians who will both support and oppose intervention, Assad, the US, whatever. They are having a civil war, clearly that nation is divided in opinion rather fiercely on many issues.
But when a person can not speak with you about actual facts about actual law and such and get a response, this rant of yours is really pretty petulant. You posted your other OP in order to get the responses you now whine about. It is divisive and an exploitation of serious business as your own personal plaything.