Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
8. Well ...
Wed Aug 28, 2013, 09:17 PM
Aug 2013

Last edited Wed Aug 28, 2013, 10:14 PM - Edit history (1)

Yes ... a person, including a journalist, does not enjoy the privilege to keep the identity of a source, that has been accused of a crime, confidential.

To your second question:

No, iI haven't been living under a rock for the last 50 years ... but the rock that I have been living under (law school more than less of the last 21 years working in the law) tells me that the Supreme Court ruled that a journalist had no right to refuse testimony where he or she had witnessed criminal activity. Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972). And, ...

The SCOTUS also has held that a journalist who fails to comply with a subpoena can be held in contempt of court and fined or even sent to jail. (The Miller Case ... remember that case? Democrats cheered when Judith Miller went to jail.)

So ... I guess the rock I have been living under is the rock called "Facts" ... A place that liberals used to live.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama Administration Asks...»Reply #8