Western Powers Face Widespread Skepticism Over Military Strike On Syria [View all]
By Anthony Faiola, Published: August 28
LONDON As Western powers build their case for possible military strikes in Syria, a still-forming coalition on Wednesday confronted a chorus of resistance at home, throwing up possible delays for what initially seemed like a rapid timetable for action.
In Britain, Washingtons staunchest military ally, the ghost of faulty intelligence used to justify the 2003 invasion of Iraq hung over Prime Minister David Camerons push to punish the government of President Bashar al-Assad after last weeks alleged chemical attack near Damascus.
--CLIP
Opponents of military strikes, including a substantial minority of Camerons own Conservative Party, described multiple issues clouding a military response. There was the difficulty in assessing blame for last weeks attack, they said, as well as what they described as a still-vague mission goal. They also cited the chance that a strike could heighten violence in the region and drag allies into a more protracted operation, and lingering concerns that a blow against Assads government could strengthen extremist groups fighting within the Syrian opposition.
Ive had 100 e-mails [from constituents] on this matter and not one of them was in favor, said Adam Holloway, a Conservative member of Parliament. This idea that we want to draw a line in the sand is ridiculous. There is already a feeling that [former prime minister] Tony Blair allowed George W. Bush to drive drunk into Iraq, and that we cant trust everything were being told. And frankly, I can understand that.
MORE...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/western-powers-face-widespread-skepticism-over-military-strike-on-syria/2013/08/28/1631bc78-1016-11e3-a2b3-5e107edf9897_story.html